3 OVERALL PROGRAM CRITIQUE 3 PROGRAM LEADERSHIP 4 PROGRAM AS AN INTEGRATED EFFORT 4 PROJECT AND CORE SUMMARIES OF DISCUSSION 6 COLLABORATING INSTITUTIONS 8 ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA (Resume) 8 HUMAN SUBJECTS (Resume) 8 VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (Resume) 8 BIOHAZARD COMMENT 8 ADDITIONAL REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS (Resume) 8 BUDGETARY OVERLAP 8 INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS AND CORES 9 PROJECT 1: Cell and Tumor Responses to Diverse Anti-Mitotic Drugs 9 PROJECT 2: Quantitative Analysis of Cell Death Pathways in Cancer 16 PROJECT 3: Mitochondrial Determinants of Chemotherapy Responses in Cancer Cells 23 CORE A: Administration &Communication 30 CORE B: Automation and Imaging 32 CORE C: Mouse Tumor Biology and Imaging 34 COMMITTEE BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 38 SPECIAL EMPHASIS PANEL ROSTER DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The long-term goal of this Program Project is to understand, in precise quantitative terms, how individual cancer cells and tumors respond to drug treatment, from target engagement to induction of apoptosis to eventual tumor regression. This will improve patient care by allowing improved prediction of drug responses and rational design of combination therapies, and by identifying targets for better future drugs. We will address this goal in the context of two drug classes that trigger apoptosis in cancer cells, anti-mitotic drugs, and targeted apoptosis inducers, including TRAIL and ABT737. Experiments will be performed in cell culture and mouse tumors.
We aim for an understanding of the cellular response to these drugs that is (i) mechanistic in explaining cellular phenotypes in terms of interactions among specific proteins and other bio-molecules (ii) quantitative in applying mass-action kinetics and other mathematical formalisms to predicting the behavior of ensembles of interacting proteins from knowledge of their individual biochemistry (iii) probabilistic in accounting for the variability from one cell to the next in responses to drugs with the attendant likelihood that only a fraction of tumor cells will arrest or die in response to treatment with a chemotherapeutic drug (iv) post-genomic in analyzing diverse cell lines (and ultimately patient samples) with knowledge of their genetic differences and with the possibility of applying powerful knock-out/in and RNAi strategies to alter genotype (v) integrative in assuming that determinants of drug response are multi-factorial and that multiple interacting pathways rather than single genes or proteins must be studied. We will address these goals in four Program Specific Aims:
In aim 1 we will determine the molecular mechanisms that regulate MOMP in response to anti-mitotic drugs and ABT737.
In aim 2 we will investigate the causes of variation in cell responses to anti-mitotics and targeted inducers of apoptosis.
In aim 3 we will ask to what extent drug responses are the same in cell culture and mouse tumors, using intravital imaging and other methods.
In aim 4 we will pursue several approaches towards translating mechanistic understanding from aims 1-3 into improved patient care.
Cancer chemotherapy drugs only work for some patients, and we often do not know why. We will investigate how drugs kill cancer cells, and why drugs kill some cancer cells but not others. The knowledge we gain will help us predict which patients will be cured by a particular dnjg or drug combination, so the most effective drugs can be selected for that patient. It will also help us design more effective future drugs.
|Shi, Jue; Mitchison, Timothy J (2017) Cell death response to anti-mitotic drug treatment in cell culture, mouse tumor model and the clinic. Endocr Relat Cancer 24:T83-T96|
|Miller, Miles A; Askevold, Bjorn; Mikula, Hannes et al. (2017) Nano-palladium is a cellular catalyst for in vivo chemistry. Nat Commun 8:15906|
|Foijer, Floris; Albacker, Lee A; Bakker, Bjorn et al. (2017) Deletion of the MAD2L1 spindle assembly checkpoint gene is tolerated in mouse models of acute T-cell lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Elife 6:|
|Fallahi-Sichani, Mohammad; Becker, Verena; Izar, Benjamin et al. (2017) Adaptive resistance of melanoma cells to RAF inhibition via reversible induction of a slowly dividing de-differentiated state. Mol Syst Biol 13:905|
|Giedt, Randy J; Fumene Feruglio, Paolo; Pathania, Divya et al. (2016) Computational imaging reveals mitochondrial morphology as a biomarker of cancer phenotype and drug response. Sci Rep 6:32985|
|Lee, Robin E C; Qasaimeh, Mohammad A; Xia, Xianfang et al. (2016) NF-?B signalling and cell fate decisions in response to a short pulse of tumour necrosis factor. Sci Rep 6:39519|
|Sarosiek, Kristopher A; Letai, Anthony (2016) Directly targeting the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis for cancer therapy using BH3 mimetics - recent successes, current challenges and future promise. FEBS J 283:3523-3533|
|Bhola, Patrick D; Mar, Brenton G; Lindsley, R Coleman et al. (2016) Functionally identifiable apoptosis-insensitive subpopulations determine chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Invest 126:3827-3836|
|Chittajallu, Deepak R; Florian, Stefan; Kohler, Rainer H et al. (2015) In vivo cell-cycle profiling in xenograft tumors by quantitative intravital microscopy. Nat Methods 12:577-85|
|Krukenberg, Kristin A; Kim, Sujeong; Tan, Edwin S et al. (2015) Extracellular poly(ADP-ribose) is a pro-inflammatory signal for macrophages. Chem Biol 22:446-452|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 61 publications