The program theme is to identify effective breast cancer screening strategies for women with diverse levels of breast cancer risk to maximize screening benefits while minimizing potential harms. Program aims follow the premise that breast cancer screening will be most effective when: guidelines are based on accurate risk estimates that are tied to the effectiveness and harms of screening tests;women and physicians are informed about screening test performance based on risk level;risk-based screening practices are equitable;and high-quality comparative effectiveness research results are disseminated into community practice. Program goals will be met through three complementary research projects and three shared resource cores. Project 1, Risk Assessment in Community Practice: Developing Better Models, will improve prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes among women of varying ages and race/ethnicity and evaluate whether predicted risk can be used to optimize screening outcomes. Project 2, Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening in Community Practice, will characterize the performance of advanced imaging technologies and screening strategies according to age, race/ethnicity, breast density, and overall breast cancer risk. Project 3, Community-based Utilization of Breast Imaging Technologies, will assess risk-based screening in diverse populations and identify disparities in access and use of new technologies. The Administrative Core will support logistical requirements and facilitate communication and data sharing. The Biostatistics and Data Management Core will coordinate data collection, management, and analysis and will develop statistical methods. The Comparative Effectiveness Core will use simulation modeling to estimate long-term implications of different screening practices on population health. The program represents an integrated effort to improve screening with the overall aim of averting deaths from breast cancer while minimizing harms.
New breast cancer screening technologies should improve early detection while minimizing health care resource use and harms associated with false-positive results and unnecessary tests. Our study will provide information on the performance of traditional and advanced imaging technologies in women at various ages, depending on their risk and individual characteristics.
|Sprague, Brian L; Stout, Natasha K; Schechter, Clyde et al. (2015) Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 162:157-66|
|Sprague, Brian L; Gangnon, Ronald E; Burt, Veronica et al. (2014) Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:|
|Wirtz, Heidi S; Boudreau, Denise M; Gralow, Julie R et al. (2014) Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:541-50|
|Houssami, Nehmat; Abraham, Linn A; Onega, Tracy et al. (2014) Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:765-73|
|Carrell, David S; Halgrim, Scott; Tran, Diem-Thy et al. (2014) Carrell et al. respond to "Observational research and the EHR". Am J Epidemiol 179:762-3|
|Lee, Christoph I; Ichikawa, Laura; Rochelle, Michele C et al. (2014) Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices. Acad Radiol 21:1370-6|
|O'Donoghue, Cristina; Eklund, Martin; Ozanne, Elissa M et al. (2014) Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines. Ann Intern Med 160:145|
|Boudreau, Denise M; Yu, Onchee; Chubak, Jessica et al. (2014) Comparative safety of cardiovascular medication use and breast cancer outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:405-16|
|Wernli, Karen J; DeMartini, Wendy B; Ichikawa, Laura et al. (2014) Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med 174:125-32|
|Stout, Natasha K; Lee, Sandra J; Schechter, Clyde B et al. (2014) Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju092|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 25 publications