Decision-making regarding breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with favorable prognoses poses challenges for clinicians and patients alike given the relatively low marginal benefit of chemotherapy. Genomic profile assays in early stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer refine estimates of both the risk of distant recurrence and the marginal benefit of chemotherapy over endocrine therapy alone and thereby enhance individualized care for patients with cancer. The benefits of the assay, however, will be realized only if the assay is used in the right patients and if receipt of chemotherapy is guided by assay results. The extent to which genomic profiling assays are used in practice and the impact of the assay results on receipt of chemotherapy in population-based patient samples are unknown.
The aims of this study are to investigate patient and clinician factors associated with the use of genomic profiles, specifically the 21-gene assay, and the impact of the assay on receipt of chemotherapy in at population-based sample. In addition, the study findings will inform innovative dissemination strategies of our research findings among oncologists. To achieve these aims, we will conduct a prospective population-based cohort study of 3,200 patients with early stage invasive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and their treating oncologists (approximately 270) in the state-wide New Jersey and Georgia Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Patients who are candidates for the genomic assay and their oncologists will be surveyed several months after diagnosis. Patient-reported variables, oncologist knowledge and attitudes elicited through vignettes, practice characteristics obtained from the oncologist survey, and SEER data will be merged to create a unique dataset. Multilevel analyses will incorporate consideration of patient, clinician, and practice influences on use of the assay and receipt of chemotherapy. The project aims will address critical barriers to our understanding of use and diffusion of tests-not only in breast cancer-^that promote individualized care and will ultimately help guide policies and interventions aimed at improving care.

Public Health Relevance

Genomic assays of primary breast cancers can refine estimates of the risk of recurrence and the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with relatively favorable prognoses. This project, to be conducted in a large population-based sample of patients and their oncologists, will lay the foundation for understanding use of genomic assays and the receipt of treatment in response to genomic assays in breast and other cancers.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-RPRB-B (M1))
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor
United States
Zip Code
Martinez, Kathryn A; Resnicow, Ken; Williams, Geoffrey C et al. (2016) Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment? Patient Educ Couns 99:1947-1954
Wallner, Lauren P; Martinez, Kathryn A; Li, Yun et al. (2016) Use of Online Communication by Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer During the Treatment Decision Process. JAMA Oncol 2:1654-1656
Kerber, Kevin A; Meurer, William J; Brown, Devin L et al. (2015) Stroke risk stratification in acute dizziness presentations: A prospective imaging-based study. Neurology 85:1869-78
Martinez, Kathryn A; Kurian, Allison W; Hawley, Sarah T et al. (2015) How can we best respect patient autonomy in breast cancer treatment decisions? Breast Cancer Manag 4:53-64
Katz, Steven J; Kurian, Allison W; Morrow, Monica (2015) Treatment Decision Making and Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Mainstreaming Mutations. JAMA 314:997-8
Shumway, Dean; Griffith, Kent A; Jagsi, Reshma et al. (2015) Psychometric properties of a brief measure of autonomy support in breast cancer patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15:51
Katz, Steven J (2014) Treatment decision aids are unlikely to cut healthcare costs. BMJ 348:g1172
Resnicow, Ken; Abrahamse, Paul; Tocco, Rachel S et al. (2014) Development and psychometric properties of a brief measure of subjective decision quality for breast cancer treatment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 14:110
Katz, Steven J; Belkora, Jeffrey; Elwyn, Glyn (2014) Shared decision making for treatment of cancer: challenges and opportunities. J Oncol Pract 10:206-8
Katz, Steven J; Hawley, Sarah (2014) Patient-physician shared decision making--reply. JAMA 311:864

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12 publications