Decision-making regarding breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with favorable prognoses poses challenges for clinicians and patients alike given the relatively low marginal benefit of chemotherapy. Genomic profile assays in early stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer refine estimates of both the risk of distant recurrence and the marginal benefit of chemotherapy over endocrine therapy alone and thereby enhance individualized care for patients with cancer. The benefits of the assay, however, will be realized only if the assay is used in the right patients and if receipt of chemotherapy is guided by assay results. The extent to which genomic profiling assays are used in practice and the impact of the assay results on receipt of chemotherapy in population-based patient samples are unknown.
The aims of this study are to investigate patient and clinician factors associated with the use of genomic profiles, specifically the 21-gene assay, and the impact of the assay on receipt of chemotherapy in at population-based sample. In addition, the study findings will inform innovative dissemination strategies of our research findings among oncologists. To achieve these aims, we will conduct a prospective population-based cohort study of 3,200 patients with early stage invasive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and their treating oncologists (approximately 270) in the state-wide New Jersey and Georgia Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Patients who are candidates for the genomic assay and their oncologists will be surveyed several months after diagnosis. Patient-reported variables, oncologist knowledge and attitudes elicited through vignettes, practice characteristics obtained from the oncologist survey, and SEER data will be merged to create a unique dataset. Multilevel analyses will incorporate consideration of patient, clinician, and practice influences on use of the assay and receipt of chemotherapy. The project aims will address critical barriers to our understanding of use and diffusion of tests-not only in breast cancer-^that promote individualized care and will ultimately help guide policies and interventions aimed at improving care.

Public Health Relevance

Genomic assays of primary breast cancers can refine estimates of the risk of recurrence and the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with relatively favorable prognoses. This project, to be conducted in a large population-based sample of patients and their oncologists, will lay the foundation for understanding use of genomic assays and the receipt of treatment in response to genomic assays in breast and other cancers.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA163233-03
Application #
8726340
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-RPRB-B)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-09-01
Budget End
2015-08-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$281,202
Indirect Cost
$90,883
Name
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Department
Type
DUNS #
073133571
City
Ann Arbor
State
MI
Country
United States
Zip Code
48109
Katz, Steven J; Hawley, Sarah T; Hamilton, Ann S et al. (2018) Surgeon Influence on Variation in Receipt of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 153:29-36
Lee, Kamaria L; Janz, Nancy K; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J et al. (2018) What Factors Influence Women's Perceptions of their Systemic Recurrence Risk after Breast Cancer Treatment? Med Decis Making 38:95-106
Morrow, Monica; Jagsi, Reshma; McLeod, M Chandler et al. (2018) Surgeon Attitudes Toward the Omission of Axillary Dissection in Early Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:1511-1516
Radhakrishnan, Archana; Chandler McLeod, M; Hamilton, Ann S et al. (2018) Preferences for Physician Roles in Follow-up Care During Survivorship: Do Patients, Primary Care Providers, and Oncologists Agree? J Gen Intern Med :
Jagsi, Reshma; Ward, Kevin C; Abrahamse, Paul H et al. (2018) Unmet need for clinician engagement regarding financial toxicity after diagnosis of breast cancer. Cancer 124:3668-3676
Kurian, Allison W; Ward, Kevin C; Hamilton, Ann S et al. (2018) Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:1066-1072
Resnicow, Ken; Patel, Minal R; Mcleod, M Chandler et al. (2018) Physician attitudes about cost consciousness for breast cancer treatment: differences by cancer sub-specialty. Breast Cancer Res Treat :
Katz, Steven J; Bondarenko, Irina; Ward, Kevin C et al. (2018) Association of Attending Surgeon With Variation in the Receipt of Genetic Testing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 153:909-916
Morrow, Monica; Abrahamse, Paul; Katz, Steven J (2018) Trend Analysis on Reoperation After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer-Reply. JAMA Oncol 4:747
Gornick, Michele C; Kurian, Allison W; An, Lawrence C et al. (2018) Knowledge regarding and patterns of genetic testing in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer participating in the iCanDecide trial. Cancer 124:4000-4009

Showing the most recent 10 out of 47 publications