A comparative perspective offers an excellent means for understanding the basic mechanisms of self-control. In comparison to human studies, animal studies offer higher levels of control over environmental aspects such as satiation and motivation and allow greater opportunity for repeated testing over time. In addition, animal studies allow for self-control assessments distinct from other cognitive and social capacities that are universal in humans (e.g., language and cultural influences). Although our initial task is to demonstrate that nonhuman animals can regulate their impulsive tendencies, our ultimate goal is to determine how that happens. What does the organism do to assert self-control? How is attention directed, and what behavioral strategies are efficient in supporting self-control? What role does the behavior of other animals play in self-control and can changes in social situations improve self-control? Are self-control capacities a limited resource (like aspects of memory or even muscle exertion)? What brain regions support inhibitory processes in these animals, and do they match those found in humans? [Finally, how does development interact with each of these questions?] The significance of these studies is a better understanding of why self-control fails, how such failures are linked to environmental and biological influences, and what strategies might be used to improve self-control in situations in which impulsivity is the likely response of the organism. The consequences of self-control failures cannot be overstated. Overeating, drug use, risky sexual behavior, compulsive gambling, and physical aggression all occur because of a lack of behavioral restraint, and they have direct negative effects on health, wellbeing, and society. All of these behaviors result from short-sightedness in evaluating outcomes, a central feature of impulsivity. The well-established literature on delay discounting indicates clearly that animals (including humans) typically value things nearer in time while devaluing those further in the future (e.g., Estle et al., 2007;Green et al., 2004;Kagel et al., 1986;Logue, 1988;Odum &Rainuad, 2003). Of course, in some instances short-term interests should be valued at a premium given uncertainty about the future. Never knowing when one would next encounter a plentiful food source or an opportunity to mate meant that activities available here and now were highly valued. However, with the development of future-oriented processes such as planning, and the emergence of accurate memories of past opportunities taken and avoided, organisms could anticipate the likelihood of better future rewards and the cost of taking or avoiding current rewards.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01HD060563-03
Application #
8379170
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHD1-DSR-H)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2012-09-01
Budget End
2013-08-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$83,093
Indirect Cost
$24,438
Name
Georgia State University
Department
Type
DUNS #
837322494
City
Atlanta
State
GA
Country
United States
Zip Code
30302
Voelker, Pascale; Piscopo, Denise; Weible, Aldis P et al. (2017) How changes in white matter might underlie improved reaction time due to practice. Cogn Neurosci 8:112-118
Hopkins, William D; Meguerditchian, Adrien; Coulon, Olivier et al. (2017) Motor skill for tool-use is associated with asymmetries in Broca's area and the motor hand area of the precentral gyrus in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behav Brain Res 318:71-81
Parrish, Audrey E; Otalora-Garcia, Anamaria; Beran, Michael J (2017) Dealing with interference: Chimpanzees respond to conflicting cues in a food-choice memory task. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn 43:366-376
Smith, Travis R; Beran, Michael J; Young, Michael E (2017) Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes. Learn Behav 45:288-299
Voelker, Pascale; Sheese, Brad E; Rothbart, Mary K et al. (2017) Methylation polymorphism influences practice effects in children during attention tasks. Cogn Neurosci 8:72-84
Hopkins, William D; Coulon, Oliver; Meguerditchian, Adrien et al. (2017) Genetic Factors and Orofacial Motor Learning Selectively Influence Variability in Central Sulcus Morphology in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Neurosci 37:5475-5483
Smith, J David; Church, Barbara A (2017) Dissociable learning processes in comparative psychology. Psychon Bull Rev :
Zakrzewski, Alexandria C; Church, Barbara A; Smith, J David (2017) The Transfer of Category Knowledge by Macaques (Macaca mulatta) and Humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol :
Voelker, Pascale; Piscopo, Denise; Weible, Aldis P et al. (2017) White matter and reaction time: Reply to commentaries. Cogn Neurosci 8:137-140
Bradstreet, Lauren E; Hecht, Erin E; King, Tricia Z et al. (2017) Associations between autistic traits and fractional anisotropy values in white matter tracts in a nonclinical sample of young adults. Exp Brain Res 235:259-267

Showing the most recent 10 out of 173 publications