We propose to expand an existing study of public housing relocations in the City of Atlanta to examine how relocation among public housing residents to new neighborhoods will affect their health. Our existing study consists of following a sample of 387 respondents from 7 public housing projects over time (6 and 18 months post-relocation), as they are relocated out of public housing and into private market housing.
Our specific aims, for which we are requesting funding, are 1) to assess the new homes and the built environments of the new neighborhoods, that public housing residents relocate to, in order to determine their impact on the health of the sample;and 2) assess the person-environment fit of residents with their new neighborhoods, and investigate whether it mediates the association between neighborhood disadvantage and health. Neighborhoods have barriers that make it difficult for all individuals to meet their health needs. The person-environment fit framework asserts that persons have resources and competencies with which to deal with neighborhood barriers, therefore when persons'needs are met by their neighborhoods then there is a good fit. Using administrative data on neighborhoods, audits of new homes and neighborhoods combined with individual level data from surveys, we will examine path models of the effects of neighborhoods on health allowing the person environment fit to mediate the associations.We hypothesize that aspects of the built environment and homes will explain variation in health symptoms within the new neighborhoods and that respondents who have positive subjective attitudes towards their new homes and neighborhoods will experience better health than those that do not even if the objective measures of their neighborhoods are poor. Our ultimate goal is to inform both housing policy and health policy in regards to how relocations affect the lives and health of public housing residents, and beyond that to develop a model of how neighborhood disadvantage operates through the fit of persons with their environments. Our most important long term goal is to reduce racial health disparities and this is the group whose poor health is a major reason for existing health disparities.

Public Health Relevance

Although there will be no direct benefits to the respondents themselves, there are potentially great social and political gains from knowledge of the relocation process, factors affecting health and psychological functioning before and after the relocation period. Knowledge gained can inform both public health policy and housing policy. Most importantly we can address the health of the minority group that has both the worst health and lives in the worst circumstances in our nation

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Exploratory Grants (P20)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMD1-PA)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Georgia State University
United States
Zip Code
Rothenberg, Richard; Weaver, Scott R; Dai, Dajun et al. (2014) A flexible urban health index for small area disparities. J Urban Health 91:823-35
McGill, Tia M; Self-Brown, Shannon R; Lai, Betty S et al. (2014) Effects of Exposure to Community Violence and Family Violence on School Functioning Problems among Urban Youth: The Potential Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms. Front Public Health 2:8
Gao, Junling; Weaver, Scott R; Fua, Hua et al. (2014) Does workplace social capital associate with hazardous drinking among Chinese rural-urban migrant workers? PLoS One 9:e115286
Kim, Su Yeong; Wang, Yijie; Weaver, Scott R et al. (2014) Measurement equivalence of the language-brokering scale for Chinese American adolescents and their parents. J Fam Psychol 28:180-92
Gao, Junling; Weaver, Scott R; Dai, Junming et al. (2014) Workplace social capital and mental health among Chinese employees: a multi-level, cross-sectional study. PLoS One 9:e85005