Research on tailoring for health-related behaviors and decision-making has increased dramatically since the early 1990's. Results from numerous randomized trials suggest that tailored communications for cancer prevention and control have a greater influence on behavioral and decision making outcomes than one-size-fits-all approaches. Until recently, however, we had little understanding of why tailored communications influenced behavior, or which components of these communications were effective. CECCR1 funding helped us to organize a concerted interdisciplinary effort to open the "black box" of health communications interventions, which led to identifying a broad array of psychosocial and communications components relevant to health behavior change and decision making. We also identified important individual characteristics that moderate the impact of health communications messages. Results from several of these studies have already been published, and are leading to significant new research funding and a new generation of health communications investigators. Moreover, CECCR1 results are also being adopted in health care, employer, pharmaceutical, and government settings of the U.S. and other parts of the world. The overarching aims of CECCR2 are to: (1) Extend our tailoring research beyond the prevention area to the broader cancer care continuum, including early detection, treatment, and long-term survival;(2) Extend our tailoring research to new clinical and post-treatment settings;(3) Deepen our understanding of the key psychosocial and communications components identified in CECCR1, including motivation, ethnic identity, risk perception, and cognitive processing;(4) Explore methods of tailoring to patient preferences for shared decision making;(5) Develop new social and cognitive neuroscience strategies for identifying immediate impact and mechanisms of health communications messages;(6) Develop new interdisciplinary collaborations with scientists and research institutions;(7) Train a new generation of health communications scientists and practitioners;and (8) Disseminate both the scientific and practical results of our research efforts. Woven through CECCR2 research are crosscutting interests related to: tailoring and relevant communications channels;reaching underserved populations through more relevant and easier-to-process content;physiological mechanisms of communication effect;and methodological issues of design, data collection, and measurement. CECCR2 involves four primary research sites and networks, and collaborations with 34 research investigators from 13 institutions. Because of the ambitious scope of our proposed studies, we have obtained over $10 million in matched funding from other sources to help us carry out the proposed research.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRRB-U (O1))
Program Officer
Blake, Kelly D
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Schools of Public Health
Ann Arbor
United States
Zip Code
Shay, L Aubree; Lafata, Jennifer Elston (2014) Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 96:295-301
Banegas, Matthew P; McClure, Jennifer B; Barlow, William E et al. (2013) Results from a randomized trial of a web-based, tailored decision aid for women at high risk for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 91:364-71
Dillard, Amanda J; Scherer, Laura; Ubel, Peter A et al. (2013) Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid. Soc Sci Med 77:13-9
Krein, Sarah L; Kadri, Reema; Hughes, Maria et al. (2013) Pedometer-based internet-mediated intervention for adults with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 15:e181
Ubel, Peter A; Berry, Scott R; Nadler, Eric et al. (2012) In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:709-17
Kim, C; Draska, M; Hess, M L et al. (2012) A web-based pedometer programme in women with a recent history of gestational diabetes. Diabet Med 29:278-83
Fagerlin, Angela; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J; Ubel, Peter A (2011) Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1436-43
Kim, Catherine; Herman, William H; Cheung, N Wah et al. (2011) Comparison of hemoglobin A1c with fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postchallenge glucose for risk stratification among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 34:1949-51
Dillard, Amanda J; Ubel, Peter A; Smith, Dylan M et al. (2011) The distinct role of comparative risk perceptions in a breast cancer prevention program. Ann Behav Med 42:262-8
Davis, Rachel E; Resnicow, Ken; Couper, Mick P (2011) Survey Response Styles, Acculturation, and Culture Among a Sample of Mexican American Adults. J Cross Cult Psychol 42:1219-1236

Showing the most recent 10 out of 47 publications