Although there is considerable evidence that cochlear implants can result in significant audiological psychological benefit for postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened children, that same evidence indicates there is extreme variability in the outcomes. To determine the factors that contribute to this variability, preimplant psychological variables will be studied. For the postlingually deafened adults, cognitive measures and participatory compliance measures are emphasized. Previous work in this laboratory has demonstrated that these variables are potentially useful predictors of implant outcomes, but replication is required before their clinical utility can be assumed. Additionally the new generation of implants offers the possibility of optimally fitting the speech processor to the subject. In a sample of such optimized fittings, it is possible that psychological variables may account for even more variance in implant outcome. The proposed research is designed to assess that possibility. Predicting the outcome of implants with children requires understanding the role of parents as well as the role of child specific variables. The present research will examine the role of both factors in the use and outcome of cochlear implants with prelingually deafened children. In addition to audiological outcomes, the prospect of improving the """"""""quality of life"""""""" of implant recipients is another justification for their use. To determine the impact of implants on quality of life, a set of psychological variables were selected on the basis of existing research on the psychological status of post-lingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened children. These variables will be assessed in a longitudinal design and changes will be related to the audiological outcome of the implant.

Project Start
1997-09-01
Project End
1998-08-31
Budget Start
1996-10-01
Budget End
1997-09-30
Support Year
13
Fiscal Year
1997
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Iowa
Department
Type
DUNS #
041294109
City
Iowa City
State
IA
Country
United States
Zip Code
52242
Shearer, A Eliot; Tejani, Viral D; Brown, Carolyn J et al. (2018) In Vivo Electrocochleography in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users Implicates TMPRSS3 in Spiral Ganglion Function. Sci Rep 8:14165
Adunka, Oliver F; Gantz, Bruce J; Dunn, Camille et al. (2018) Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 159:215-219
Smith, Nicholas A; McMurray, Bob (2018) Temporal Responsiveness in Mother-Child Dialogue: A Longitudinal Analysis of Children with Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss. Infancy 23:410-431
Wu, Yu-Hsiang; Stangl, Elizabeth; Chipara, Octav et al. (2018) Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss. Ear Hear 39:293-304
Gantz, Bruce J; Dunn, Camille C; Oleson, Jacob et al. (2018) Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results. Laryngoscope 128:473-481
Kim, Jeong-Seo; Tejani, Viral D; Abbas, Paul J et al. (2018) Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure. Hear Res 370:304-315
Goman, Adele M; Dunn, Camille C; Gantz, Bruce J et al. (2018) PREVALENCE OF POTENTIAL HYBRID AND CONVENTIONAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT CANDIDATES BASED ON AUDIOMETRIC PROFILE. Otol Neurotol 39:515-517
Bonnard, Damien; Schwalje, Adam; Gantz, Bruce et al. (2018) Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users. Hear Res 367:223-230
Pimperton, Hannah; Walker, Elizabeth A (2018) Word Learning in Children With Cochlear Implants: Examining Performance Relative to Hearing Peers and Relations With Age at Implantation. Ear Hear 39:980-991
McMurray, Bob; Ellis, Tyler P; Apfelbaum, Keith S (2018) How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs. Ear Hear :

Showing the most recent 10 out of 247 publications