Living cells use molecular control circuits to achieve complex behaviors such as homeostasis and adaptation. Typically, such systems are studied on a case-by-case basis, using reverse engineering to dissect the structure of individual regulatory networks. Because of the obscuring effects of evolution, such approaches often fail to reveal the core design principles underlying function. To overcome this problem we propose to apply forward engineering and comparative genomic approaches to understand the design principles of biological circuits. We will focus on understanding adaptation - a property of many sensory systems in which cells respond to an input in a transient manner, but then reset to allow response to further increases in input. We will ask not how any one particular system works, but rather what are the core network structures required to achieve adaptation, and what are the diverse ways in which such structures can be implemented with biological components.
Our specific aims are to: (1) Theoretically define the design rules of adaptation circuits - computationally enumerate and classify all core architecture families that can robustly perform adaptation. (2) Build synthetic adaptation circuits;empirically test and refine our models for circuit structure/function relationships. These will be constructed in yeast using a toolkit of modular molecular parts optimized for engineering of kinase networks. (3) Analyze the variation in natural adaptation circuits across species;we will focus primarily on the osmo-stress response in diverse fungal species, but will also quantitatively explore adaptation circuits in other yeast and mammalian stress response pathways.
This engineering-inspired approach has the potential to revolutionize medicine. First, the fundamental understanding of circuit structure/function that emerges will allow us to recognize core circuit architectures in natural systems, how these are perturbed in disease states, and how they can be reprogrammed therapeutically. Second, the ability to rapidly and predictably design synthetic networks will facilitate the engineering of smart cells that can carry out therapeutic or biotechnologically useful target functions.
|Bugaj, L J; Sabnis, A J; Mitchell, A et al. (2018) Cancer mutations and targeted drugs can disrupt dynamic signal encoding by the Ras-Erk pathway. Science 361:|
|Obernier, Kirsten; Cebrian-Silla, Arantxa; Thomson, Matthew et al. (2018) Adult Neurogenesis Is Sustained by Symmetric Self-Renewal and Differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 22:221-234.e8|
|Toda, Satoshi; Blauch, Lucas R; Tang, Sindy K Y et al. (2018) Programming self-organizing multicellular structures with synthetic cell-cell signaling. Science 361:156-162|
|Aranda-Díaz, Andrés; Mace, Kieran; Zuleta, Ignacio et al. (2017) Robust Synthetic Circuits for Two-Dimensional Control of Gene Expression in Yeast. ACS Synth Biol 6:545-554|
|Lim, Wendell A; June, Carl H (2017) The Principles of Engineering Immune Cells to Treat Cancer. Cell 168:724-740|
|Nissen, Kelly E; Homer, Christina M; Ryan, Colm J et al. (2017) The histone variant H2A.Z promotes splicing of weak introns. Genes Dev 31:688-701|
|Kim, Ji-Wook; Seo, Daeha; Lee, Jung-Uk et al. (2017) Single-cell mechanogenetics using monovalent magnetoplasmonic nanoparticles. Nat Protoc 12:1871-1889|
|Lechler, Marie C; Crawford, Emily D; Groh, Nicole et al. (2017) Reduced Insulin/IGF-1 Signaling Restores the Dynamic Properties of Key Stress Granule Proteins during Aging. Cell Rep 18:454-467|
|Wilson, Maxwell Z; Ravindran, Pavithran T; Lim, Wendell A et al. (2017) Tracing Information Flow from Erk to Target Gene Induction Reveals Mechanisms of Dynamic and Combinatorial Control. Mol Cell 67:757-769.e5|
|Datta, Anirban; Sandilands, Emma; Mostov, Keith E et al. (2017) Fibroblast-derived HGF drives acinar lung cancer cell polarization through integrin-dependent RhoA-ROCK1 inhibition. Cell Signal 40:91-98|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 183 publications