Despite influential findings regarding early reading development and prevention approaches for students with reading disabilities, many students with reading disabilities demonstrate inadequate reading comprehension in the middle grades, affecting learning which bodes unfavorably for post secondary outcomes. Project 3 is designed to address 3 aims that build on the findings from the previous 5 years of research (Vaughn &Fletcher, in press) with struggling readers in grades 6- 8, capitalizing on research from Projects 1 and 2 in the proposed studies, and providing samples for Project 4.
Aim 1 determines the efficacy of reading comprehension interventions comparing outcomes of 4th graders with reading difficulties randomly assigning students (n=420) to typical classroom reading instruction or to one of two replacement interventions (Language/Knowledge or Skills/Strategies). Students will be treated for 2 years and then followed for one (through sixth grade).
Aim 2 extends the first intervention study by building on the experimental studies conducted during years 1 and 2 by Project 2 (Executive Functioning), and conducting a second RCT with a nonoverlapping sample of 4th graders with reading difficulties assigned to one of two treatment conditions, hybrid from Year 1 or hybrid from Year 1 with executive functioning practices. Like students in the 1st study, these students will also be treated for two years (grades 4 and 5) and then followed through grade 6.
Aim 3 determines student characteristics and contextual factors associated with response to intervention as a means of informing treatment decisions, and to determine the extent to which response to intervention can be predicted initially and longitudinally from students'characteristics (e.g., memory, motivation) and contextual factors (e.g., teachers'knowledge, school effectiveness ratings, neighborhoods access to literacy). Students will be assessed on efficacy impact measures including word reading, fluency, reading and listening comprehension, spelling, written expression, oral language and vocabulary. Students will also be assessed on student characteristics (e.g., working memory) and behavioral measures (e.g., self-regulation) as well as measures related to teacher and school context (e.g., classroom climate). It is
Project 3 is relevant because of its focus on reading comprehension, self regulation/executive functions, and children in the upper elementary school who are struggling with reading. It represents translational research that immediately informs the practice community by identifying instructional practices and approaches associated with improved outcomes in reading comprehension as well as the extent to which malleable cognitive processes influence comprehension related outcomes, focusing on children who are difficult to
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G; Kremer, Kristen P (2016) Breastfeeding and child development outcomes: an investigation of the nurturing hypothesis. Matern Child Nutr 12:757-67|
|Williams, Kelly J; Walker, Melodee A; Vaughn, Sharon et al. (2016) A Synthesis of Reading and Spelling Interventions and Their Effects on Spelling Outcomes for Students With Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil :|
|Cirino, Paul T; Miciak, Jeremy; Gerst, Elyssa et al. (2016) Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study. J Learn Disabil :|
|Hodge, David R; Salas-Wright, Christopher P; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Behavioral Risk Profiles of Homeschooled Adolescents in the United States: A Nationally Representative Examination of Substance Use Related Outcomes. Subst Use Misuse :1-13|
|Dimitriadis, Stavros I; Laskaris, Nikolaos A; Simos, Panagiotis G et al. (2016) Greater Repertoire and Temporal Variability of Cross-Frequency Coupling (CFC) Modes in Resting-State Neuromagnetic Recordings among Children with Reading Difficulties. Front Hum Neurosci 10:163|
|Fletcher, Jack M; Miciak, Jeremy (2016) Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments are not Necessary for the Identification and Treatment of Learning Disabilities. Arch Clin Neuropsychol :|
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Household Food Insecurity and Children's Behaviour Problems: New Evidence from a Trajectories-Based Study. Br J Soc Work 46:993-1008|
|Taylor, W Pat; Miciak, Jeremy; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Discrepancy Models for Specific Learning Disabilities Identification: Simulations of Psychometric Limitations. Psychol Assess :|
|Wanzek, Jeanne; Vaughn, Sharon; Scammacca, Nancy et al. (2016) Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3. Educ Psychol Rev 28:551-576|
|Barnes, Marcia A; Stuebing, Karla; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models. J Res Educ Eff 9:153-172|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 106 publications