Executive Functions (EFs) are conceptualized in different, yet overlapping ways in the neuropsychological, cognitive, and educational literatures, and they have a robust relationship to reading comprehension (RC) and other academic skills. Commonalities include the processes necessary for approaching problems, for generating/selecting/implementing strategies relevant to the goal of solving a problem, and for monitoring those processes to alter course if needed. Reflecting these commonalities, EFs are defined here as domain general control processes important for managing goal-directed behavior. Project 2 is designed to clarify the structure of EF, determine the relevance of that structure to RC and other academic skills, and evaluate how EF might most effectively be integrated into remedial RC interventions such as those proposed by Project 3.
Aim 1 assesses dimensions of EF (shifting, inhibition, attentional control, fluency, planning, regulatory control, and contextual learning) using latent variables in a large, diverse sample (N=750) of children aged 8 to 12. Interrelationships of EF dimensions, and with non-EF dimensions, are evaluated with RC as a criterion, including comparisons among subgroups of students with difficulty in different academic domains.
Aim 2 manipulates key instructional components (similar to those used in Project 3) in conjunction with student EF characteristics in struggling and typical readers. Manipulated components identify what types of instruction are differentially effective (incorporating background knowledge and self-regulation to varying degrees;comparing strategies individually and collectively with self-regulation components). EF characteristics evaluates for whom manipulations might be differentially effective. It is expected that Project 2 will produce a useful framework for guiding research linking EF with RC, elucidating the value-added contribution of EF in the context of known language-based contributions. We have organized Projects 2 and 3 to accelerate the often delayed connection between cognitive processing type studies like those proposed in Project 2 and intervention studies like those proposed in Project 3 by co-designing the studies so that findings can be integrated with the intent of developing more impactful interventions.
Executive functions and related models of working memory and self-regulation are cognitive and behavioral skills important for adaptive behavior, including academic learning such as reading comprehension. But, executive functions are measured in many ways, and overlap with language and other aspects of cognition. Therefore, Project 2 develops a framework to better understand what these functions are, what they are not, and how to use that understanding to best capitalize on methods to enhance reading comprehension.
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G; Kremer, Kristen P (2016) Breastfeeding and child development outcomes: an investigation of the nurturing hypothesis. Matern Child Nutr 12:757-67|
|Williams, Kelly J; Walker, Melodee A; Vaughn, Sharon et al. (2016) A Synthesis of Reading and Spelling Interventions and Their Effects on Spelling Outcomes for Students With Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil :|
|Cirino, Paul T; Miciak, Jeremy; Gerst, Elyssa et al. (2016) Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study. J Learn Disabil :|
|Hodge, David R; Salas-Wright, Christopher P; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Behavioral Risk Profiles of Homeschooled Adolescents in the United States: A Nationally Representative Examination of Substance Use Related Outcomes. Subst Use Misuse :1-13|
|Dimitriadis, Stavros I; Laskaris, Nikolaos A; Simos, Panagiotis G et al. (2016) Greater Repertoire and Temporal Variability of Cross-Frequency Coupling (CFC) Modes in Resting-State Neuromagnetic Recordings among Children with Reading Difficulties. Front Hum Neurosci 10:163|
|Fletcher, Jack M; Miciak, Jeremy (2016) Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments are not Necessary for the Identification and Treatment of Learning Disabilities. Arch Clin Neuropsychol :|
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Household Food Insecurity and Children's Behaviour Problems: New Evidence from a Trajectories-Based Study. Br J Soc Work 46:993-1008|
|Taylor, W Pat; Miciak, Jeremy; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Discrepancy Models for Specific Learning Disabilities Identification: Simulations of Psychometric Limitations. Psychol Assess :|
|Wanzek, Jeanne; Vaughn, Sharon; Scammacca, Nancy et al. (2016) Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3. Educ Psychol Rev 28:551-576|
|Barnes, Marcia A; Stuebing, Karla; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models. J Res Educ Eff 9:153-172|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 106 publications