Definition and classification are critical features of scientific research and many areas of practice regardless of whether the phenomena in question are genuinely categorical or continuous. An agreed upon definition of learning disability serves as an essential foundation for research. Without an agreed upon definition that can be implemented reliably and validly, understanding the nature, causes, and best treatments for learning disabilities is unlikely. Although we have not yet achieved a reliable and valid definition and system of classification for learning disabilities, doing so now represents an attainable scientific objective because we now understand the fundamental problem that has prevented development of a reliable and valid definition and classification system, and this understanding points the way to a potential solution in the form of a model that incorporates multiple sources of information in a theoretically grounded way. This project has three specific aims. The first is to further develop and test a constellation model of word-level developmental reading disability. This will be done through simulation, modeling of empirical relations among measures in the large-scale Florida PMRN database, and an empirical study of students with word-level reading disability.
The second aim i s to begin the process of extending the model to other potential learning disabilities in reading and writing. Doing so requires better understanding of the simultaneous development of oral language, reading, and writing skills, and this will be accomplished using a cohort-sequential longitudinal study.
The third aim i s to identify potential subtypes of reading and writing disabilities. When theoretically-motivated potential subtypes have been subject to rigorous empirical test, important knowledge has emerged such as support for a phonological form of developmental reading disability as a developmental difference but not for a surface form. Identifying potential subtypes of reading and writing disabilities will be accomplished by testing a priori proposed subtypes using a latent-variable regression-based approach applied to both reading and writing data collected in the previously mentioned empirical studies.
The proposed studies have the potential to provide a reliable and valid definition and system of classification for learning disabilities. Accomplishing this objective has the potential to accelerate our understanding of the nature of learning disabilities and to develop more effective means of prevention, early identification, and intervention.
|Quinn, Jamie M; Wagner, Richard K (2015) Gender Differences in Reading Impairment and in the Identification of Impaired Readers: Results From a Large-Scale Study of At-Risk Readers. J Learn Disabil 48:433-45|
|Quinn, Jamie M; Wagner, Richard K; Petscher, Yaacov et al. (2015) Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: a latent change score modeling study. Child Dev 86:159-75|
|Wagner, Richard K; Herrera, Sarah K; Spencer, Mercedes et al. (2015) Reconsidering the simple view of reading in an intriguing case of equivalent models: commentary on Tunmer and Chapman (2012). J Learn Disabil 48:115-9|
|Taylor, Jeanette; Hart, Sara A (2014) A Chaotic Home Environment Accounts for the Association between Respect for Rules Disposition and Reading Comprehension: A Twin Study. Learn Individ Differ 35:70-77|
|Puranik, Cynthia S; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Sidler, Jessica Folsom et al. (2014) Exploring the Amount and Type of Writing Instruction during Language Arts Instruction in Kindergarten Classrooms. Read Writ 27:213-236|
|Kim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Puranik, Cynthia et al. (2014) The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Read Writ 27:237-253|
|Spencer, Mercedes; Wagner, Richard K; Schatschneider, Christopher et al. (2014) Incorporating RTI in a Hybrid Model of Reading Disability. Learn Disabil Q 37:161-171|
|Connor, Carol McDonald; Spencer, Mercedes; Day, Stephanie L et al. (2014) Capturing the complexity: Content, type, and amount of instruction and quality of the classroom learning environment synergistically predict third graders' vocabulary and reading comprehension outcomes. J Educ Psychol 106:762-778|
|Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wagner, Richard K; Miller, Brett (2014) "Waiting to Fail" Redux: Understanding Inadequate Response to Intervention. Learn Disabil Q 37:129-133|
|Wanzek, Jeanne; Roberts, Greg; Al Otaiba, Stephanie et al. (2014) The Relationship of Print Reading in Tier I Instruction and Reading Achievement for Kindergarten Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties. Learn Disabil Q 37:148-160|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 80 publications