This Project investigates the basic computations at work in making simple social decisions, and contrasts them with simple non-social decisions (e.g., ones based on the value of juice or money, rather than the value of other people). It sets the stage for all the others in investigating how social reward is represented and compares to nonsocial reward. An example of a non-social decision is choosing what to drink by pushing one of several buttons on a soda dispensing machine, an example of a social decision is choosing what person to call to go on a date. Here we address these questions: Are there regions in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex that encode stimulus values at the time of choice, and experienced (hedonic) values at the time of outcome, in the social domain (seeing smiling or beautiful faces), as they do in the nonsocial case (getting juice when thirsty)? Are there neurons specialized for valuation of social stimuli, or do the same cells encode value in social and non-social decisions? Does the valuation of different types of social stimuli require specific sub-circuits? And how are individual differences between people reflected in these processes? We will address these questions by carrying out parallel experiments in humans and rhesus monkeys, using the complementary techniques of fMRI and electrophysiological recording in both species, and using a variety of basic social and non-social stimuli. Comparisons will be made across species and across single-unit, local field potential, and BOLD-fMRI data, as well as with data from the other Projects and across individual differences.
Many mental illnesses are associated with the most disabling dysfunction in the social domain. For instance, people with autism are impaired in their social interactions. A major limitation in our understanding of those disorders is that we do not yet understand how social reward signals are processed in the brain, and how they guide behavior This Project constitutes the foundation of that investigation and will have relevance for the ultimate diagnosis, management and treatment of mental illnesses.
|Wang, Shuo; Tsuchiya, Naotsugu; New, Joshua et al. (2015) Preferential attention to animals and people is independent of the amygdala. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:371-80|
|Schaafsma, Sara M; Pfaff, Donald W; Spunt, Robert P et al. (2015) Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends Cogn Sci 19:65-72|
|Andersen, Richard A; Andersen, Kristen N; Hwang, Eun Jung et al. (2014) Optic ataxia: from Balint's syndrome to the parietal reach region. Neuron 81:967-83|
|Lak, Armin; Stauffer, William R; Schultz, Wolfram (2014) Dopamine prediction error responses integrate subjective value from different reward dimensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:2343-8|
|Spunt, Robert P; Adolphs, Ralph (2014) Validating the Why/How contrast for functional MRI studies of Theory of Mind. Neuroimage 99:301-11|
|Liljeholm, Mimi; Dunne, Simon; O'Doherty, John P (2014) Anterior insula activity reflects the effects of intentionality on the anticipation of aversive stimulation. J Neurosci 34:11339-48|
|Stetson, Chess; Andersen, Richard A (2014) The parietal reach region selectively anti-synchronizes with dorsal premotor cortex during planning. J Neurosci 34:11948-58|
|Paul, Lynn K; Corsello, Christina; Kennedy, Daniel P et al. (2014) Agenesis of the corpus callosum and autism: a comprehensive comparison. Brain 137:1813-29|
|Anderson, David J; Adolphs, Ralph (2014) A framework for studying emotions across species. Cell 157:187-200|
|Hare, Todd A; Hakimi, Shabnam; Rangel, Antonio (2014) Activity in dlPFC and its effective connectivity to vmPFC are associated with temporal discounting. Front Neurosci 8:50|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 16 publications