The Emory ACE Administrative Core (AC) is the repository of the administrative leadership, their track record, the structures and procedures for carrying out the aims of the Projects and the services of the Cores in a cost-effective fashion, to make representations to parent institutions, NIH, and other organizations and agencies, and to comply with obligations associated with the ACE award regarding the parent institutions and NIH. Specific objectives include: (1) To manage, oversee, lead and coordinate;to carry out the decision-making process, ensure productivity and quality control related to Project Aims, Core Objectives;and to represent the Emory ACE and its community of scientists, administrators and staff to parents institutions, and local, regional, national and international organizations, and, particularly NIH;(2) To ensure effective communication among the Emory ACE community of scientists, administrators and staff through effective tools and structures, and through proven procedures;(3) To ensure compliance with IRB, lACUC, NDAR, and NIH requirements and directives in a timely, cost-effective, and successful manner;and (4) To manage, maintain and expand the physical and human resources available to, and generated by, the Emory ACE. Core leadership brings rich track records of scientific, clinical, advocacy, and administrative achievements and success within complex scientific projects and organizations. The institutional (administrative, clinical and scientific infrastructure) and community-wide resources available to the Core, and more broadly, to the Emory ACE, are likely unprecedented. There are 3 oversight committees: Executive Committee (the locus of decision-making, strategic planning and execution, and centralized efforts and communication management). Internal Advisory Committee (counseling and steering ACE work and leadership, and also co-leading the Research Training &Education Core), and External Advisory Committee (providing independent feedback on key matters of science and community relevance/impact). Structures and procedures for operation and management are established for (a) manage, oversee &lead, decide, coordinate, document progress and control quality, and represent;(b) create, maintain and monitor effectiveness of tools and procedures for communication;(c) Create, maintain and continuously refine IT and data infrastructure, and comply with data sharing and other institutional requirements;and (d) maintain and continuously develop the physical and human resources ofthe ACE from a forward-looking perspective.

Public Health Relevance

The Emory ACE operates within a complex and rich, institutional, scientific, and community-outreach environment, while advancing highly synergistic but multifaceted and multi-institutional research projects and core resources. To ensure success and maximize the yield of this community of scientists - to science, to training &education, and to the community it ultimately serves, there is a need for administrative excellence that matches the scientific uniqueness and excellence ofthe research it is intended to advance.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
5P50MH100029-02
Application #
8539848
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHD1-DSR-Y)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-06-01
Budget End
2014-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$55,008
Indirect Cost
$30,060
Name
Emory University
Department
Type
DUNS #
066469933
City
Atlanta
State
GA
Country
United States
Zip Code
30322
Na, Sabrina; Li, Longchuan; Crosson, Bruce et al. (2018) White matter network topology relates to cognitive flexibility and cumulative neurological risk in adult survivors of pediatric brain tumors. Neuroimage Clin 20:485-497
Murphy, Melissa M; Lindsey Burrell, T; Cubells, Joseph F et al. (2018) Study protocol for The Emory 3q29 Project: evaluation of neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and medical symptoms in 3q29 deletion syndrome. BMC Psychiatry 18:183
Xu, Ting; Falchier, Arnaud; Sullivan, Elinor L et al. (2018) Delineating the Macroscale Areal Organization of the Macaque Cortex In Vivo. Cell Rep 23:429-441
Sifre, Robin; Olson, Lindsay; Gillespie, Scott et al. (2018) A Longitudinal Investigation of Preferential Attention to Biological Motion in 2- to 24-Month-Old Infants. Sci Rep 8:2527
Bradshaw, Jessica; Klaiman, Cheryl; Gillespie, Scott et al. (2018) Walking Ability is Associated with Social Communication Skills in Infants at High Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Infancy 23:674-691
Zhang, Tuo; Kong, Jun; Jing, Ke et al. (2018) Optimization of macaque brain DMRI connectome by neuron tracing and myelin stain data. Comput Med Imaging Graph 69:9-20
Okuda, Paola Matiko Martins; Klaiman, Cheryl; Bradshaw, Jessica et al. (2017) Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Psychiatry 8:265
Constantino, John N; Kennon-McGill, Stefanie; Weichselbaum, Claire et al. (2017) Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and is atypical in autism. Nature 547:340-344
Oguz, Ipek; Styner, Martin; Sanchez, Mar et al. (2015) LOGISMOS-B for Primates: Primate Cortical Surface Reconstruction and Thickness Measurement. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 9413:
Klin, Ami; Klaiman, Cheryl; Jones, Warren (2015) Reducing age of autism diagnosis: developmental social neuroscience meets public health challenge. Rev Neurol 60 Suppl 1:S3-11

Showing the most recent 10 out of 19 publications