Despite previous success in reducing alcohol impaired driving (AID), rates of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes have not decreased significantly since the 1990s. Developing novel approaches to prevention/intervention is likely required to produce further progress. Building on laboratory findings from the original project (Acute Alcohol Effects on Impulsivity and Risk for Drinking and Driving), the proposed project is designed to bring this work out of the lab and into the natural drinking environment in which AID decisions are made. Participants will complete a laboratory alcohol administration session followed by six weeks of multi-method ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment component will include participant report via smartphone, transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) using the BACtrack biosensor, and location and movement data passively collected by the smartphone GPS/accelerometer. The combination of these methods will allow for the integration of subjective (e.g., perceived intoxication) and objective (e.g., TAC, calculated drinking location) data for each drinking episode.
Aim 1 of the project is to test laboratory measures as prospective predictors of AID and examine the role of event-level influences on specific AID decisions.
Aim 2 of the proposed project is to test the potential for a novel intervention to reduce AID using mobile technology. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a full ambulatory assessment or a minimal assessment control condition. The timing of the introduction of AA will also be manipulated within the full ambulatory assessment condition. This design will allow us to test whether the introduction of ambulatory assessment produces changes in AID behavior, as well as whether such changes persist once ambulatory assessment is discontinued. Changes made to the revised application are aimed at ensuring the achievement of both study aims.
If Aim 2 is achieved and ambulatory assessment alters AID behavior, the combination of the minimal assessment control condition and the full assessment condition prior to the introduction of ambulatory assessment has sufficient sample size and power to test Aim 1 hypotheses.

Public Health Relevance

Although the vast majority of driving-age individuals recognize the risks involved in driving after drinking, more than 20% still report engaging in this behavior. One reason for this is that, once someone has consumed alcohol, it can both reduce their judgment and increase the likelihood that they make an impulsive decision to drive. The project will use mobile technology to assess immediate influences on the decision to drive after drinking alcohol. Further, the study is designed to test whether mobile technology can be used to reduce the risk of driving after drinking, for example by providing prompts to secure a safe ride during drinking episodes.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AA019546-07
Application #
9564833
Study Section
Addiction Risks and Mechanisms Study Section (ARM)
Program Officer
Bloss, Gregory
Project Start
2010-04-15
Project End
2022-05-31
Budget Start
2018-06-01
Budget End
2019-05-31
Support Year
7
Fiscal Year
2018
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Missouri-Columbia
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
153890272
City
Columbia
State
MO
Country
United States
Zip Code
65211
Hatz, Laura E; McCarty, Kayleigh N; Bartholow, Bruce D et al. (2018) Explicit Attitudes, Working Memory Capacity, and Driving After Drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 42:2047-2053
McCarty, Kayleigh N; Morris, David H; Hatz, Laura E et al. (2017) Differential Associations of UPPS-P Impulsivity Traits With Alcohol Problems. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 78:617-622
Arterberry, Brooke J; Treloar, Hayley; McCarthy, Denis M (2017) Empirical Profiles of Alcohol and Marijuana Use, Drugged Driving, and Risk Perceptions. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 78:889-898
Morris, David H; Amlung, Michael T; Tsai, Chia-Lin et al. (2017) Association between overall rate of change in rising breath alcohol concentration and the magnitude of acute tolerance of subjective intoxication via the Mellanby method. Hum Psychopharmacol 32:
Aston, Elizabeth R; Merrill, Jennifer E; McCarthy, Denis M et al. (2016) Risk Factors for Driving After and During Marijuana Use. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 77:309-16
Morris, David H; Treloar, Hayley; Tsai, Chia-Lin et al. (2016) Acute subjective response to alcohol as a function of reward and punishment sensitivity. Addict Behav 60:90-6
Amlung, Michael; Morris, David H; Hatz, Laura E et al. (2016) Drinking-and-Driving-Related Cognitions Mediate the Relationship Between Alcohol Demand and Alcohol-Impaired Driving. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 77:656-60
Amlung, Michael; McCarty, Kayleigh N; Morris, David H et al. (2015) Increased behavioral economic demand and craving for alcohol following a laboratory alcohol challenge. Addiction 110:1421-8
Treloar, Hayley; Martens, Matthew P; McCarthy, Denis M (2015) The Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: improved content validity of the Serious Harm Reduction subscale. Psychol Assess 27:340-6
Treloar, Hayley R; Martens, Matthew P; McCarthy, Denis M (2014) Testing measurement invariance of the protective behavioral strategies scale in college men and women. Psychol Assess 26:307-13

Showing the most recent 10 out of 16 publications