Two of the strongest influences on young adult risk taking decisions are alcohol use and social context. Yet the principal investigator the known potency of each factor in individually inducing risk-taking among youth, and the principal investigator the frequency with which young people consume alcohol in the presence of their peers, no prior research has sought to examine their concurrent and potentially interactive effects. In our model of decision-making in adolescence and young adulthood, asynchronous maturational changes in the brain's cognitive control and reward processing systems yield a period of increased proclivity for risk, and increased susceptibility to specific influences on decision-making. We hypothesize that alcohol and peer influences have their primary impacts on separate components of the brain's decision-making circuitry, with alcohol-affecting regions most closely linked to cognitive control, and peer influence acting upon the reward processing system. The combination of these individually deleterious influences may thus create a powerful "risk-taking cocktail" that disrupts processing within normally offsetting components of the brain's decision-making circuitry, and thereby increases the tendency to engage in risk-taking behaviors with potentially serious consequences (e.g. reckless driving, risky sexual activity, crime). The present application includes behavioral studies designed to test the main and interactive effects of acute alcohol consumption and peer influence on young adults'decisions about risk, as well as an fMRI studies designed to test our neurobiological framework for adolescent and young adult decision-making and the associated hypothesis regarding the separate neural loci of alcohol and social influences. In order to conduct these studies, a research team with combined expertise in the cognitive neuroscience of executive function, the psychosocial development of adolescents and young adults, and the influences of alcohol on cognition and affect, has been assembled. The proposed studies will yield fundamental insights into the effects of social context and alcohol on young adults'risk-taking behaviors, and will inform the development of more effective prevention and intervention strategies.
Knowledge of the specific mechanisms that lead to diminished decision making capacity following alcohol exposure and in the presence of peers is important to the design of interventions. To the extent that alcohol and the presence of peers may combine to impact a youth's decision-making capabilities, and these deficits in decision-making affect real world behaviors, successful interventions must be rooted in a combination of individual factors (e.g., decreasing a youth's susceptibility to peer influences) while simultaneously changing the social context. The proposed studies will deploy behavioral and fMRI methods to yield fundamental insights into the independent and interactive effects of social context and alcohol on risk-taking, and will inform the development of more effective prevention and intervention strategies.
|Smith, Ashley R; Steinberg, Laurence; Strang, Nicole et al. (2015) Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents' and adults' neural response to reward. Dev Cogn Neurosci 11:75-82|
|Weigard, Alexander; Chein, Jason; Albert, Dustin et al. (2014) Effects of anonymous peer observation on adolescents' preference for immediate rewards. Dev Sci 17:71-8|
|Smith, Ashley R; Steinberg, Laurence; Chein, Jason (2014) The role of the anterior insula in adolescent decision making. Dev Neurosci 36:196-209|
|Smith, Ashley R; Chein, Jason; Steinberg, Laurence (2014) Peers increase adolescent risk taking even when the probabilities of negative outcomes are known. Dev Psychol 50:1564-8|
|Smith, Ashley R; Chein, Jason; Steinberg, Laurence (2013) Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking. Horm Behav 64:323-32|
|Strang, Nicole M; Chein, Jason M; Steinberg, Laurence (2013) The value of the dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Front Hum Neurosci 7:223|