The general goal of this project is to provide insight into the nature and function of aging memory. The experiments proposed here follow directly from research in our laboratory concerned with a general theme that has driven our work on aging memory for the past two decades: understanding how memory operates as a constructive process that changes with age. Research in both cognitive psychology and neuroscience supports the idea that memory is not a simple recording and reproduction of experience, but instead involves constructive processes that assemble memories from bits and pieces of encoded experiences, often producing accurate memories of past events, but sometimes resulting in errors that illuminate the underlying cognitive and neural operations. Critically, we have recently begun to explore how these constructive processes allow older and younger adults to use memory to imagine or simulate events that might occur in the future or might have occurred in the past. This broad concern with understanding constructive memory and its role in cognitive and neural processes involved in imagining or simulating events guides our hypotheses and experiments. We recently demonstrated that older adults remember their pasts and imagine their futures in less detail than do younger adults. Several experiments will attempt to specify the cognitive processes that underlie these age-related changes in remembering and imagining, and assess whether the age-related deficits can be reduced or eliminated, using a new experimental approach developed recently in our laboratory that should allow us to distinguish between specific age-related changes in memory vs. more general changes in motivation or attention. We will also adapt a previously established experimental paradigm to test the novel hypothesis that older adults have specific problems flexibly recombining elements of past experience, which is critical to constructing event simulations. While our work has focused on how young and old adults simulate possible future events, throughout the adult lifespan people also construct counterfactual simulations of how past events might have turned out differently than they did. Essentially nothing is known about the effects of such simulations on memory in either young or old adults. We propose new procedures to investigate whether and how counterfactual simulations of the past affect memory accuracy in older and younger adults. Understanding how older adults imagine future events may also have important implications for understanding how they carry out intended future actions (prospective memory) and we will perform several experiments using both cognitive and neuroimaging approaches that explore this link. Further, we will also use neuroimaging to examine the effects of aging on the brain networks involved in future planning, using a new paradigm recently established in our lab. We will also use neuroimaging to examine the interaction between memory and attentional control, and the implications of this interaction for event simulation and prospective memory. Overall, the proposed experiments should both deepen and broaden our understanding of how older adults use memory to simulate events and plan for the future.

Public Health Relevance

Memory is fundamentally important to numerous aspects of our everyday lives, and disorders of memory that impair everyday functions are commonly observed in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Mental simulations of events that might occur in the future or might have occurred in the past are crucial to adaptive function, play a key role in influencing psychological well-being, and are important to planning for the future. Our work on constructive memory and event simulation should provide new insights that will enhance understanding of simulation deficits in healthy aging as well as neuropsychological and psychopathological conditions, and provide new conceptual and experimental tools for studying these conditions.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01AG008441-21
Application #
8104587
Study Section
Cognition and Perception Study Section (CP)
Program Officer
Wagster, Molly V
Project Start
1989-08-04
Project End
2017-07-31
Budget Start
2012-08-15
Budget End
2013-07-31
Support Year
21
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$168,699
Indirect Cost
$68,877
Name
Harvard University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
082359691
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138
De Brigard, Felipe; Brady, Timothy F; Ruzic, Luka et al. (2016) Tracking the emergence of memories: A category-learning paradigm to explore schema-driven recognition. Mem Cognit :
Madore, Kevin P; Jing, Helen G; Schacter, Daniel L (2016) Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: Extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction. Mem Cognit 44:974-88
Spreng, R Nathan; Stevens, W Dale; Viviano, Joseph D et al. (2016) Attenuated anticorrelation between the default and dorsal attention networks with aging: evidence from task and rest. Neurobiol Aging 45:149-60
Devitt, Aleea L; Tippett, Lynette; Schacter, Daniel L et al. (2016) Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability. Psychol Aging 31:927-942
Addis, Donna Rose; Pan, Ling; Musicaro, Regina et al. (2016) Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory 24:89-97
Maillet, David; Schacter, Daniel L (2016) When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 31:370-9
Seli, Paul; Risko, Evan F; Smilek, Daniel et al. (2016) Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention. Trends Cogn Sci 20:605-17
Jing, Helen G; Madore, Kevin P; Schacter, Daniel L (2016) Worrying about the future: An episodic specificity induction impacts problem solving, reappraisal, and well-being. J Exp Psychol Gen 145:402-18
Devitt, Aleea L; Monk-Fromont, Edwin; Schacter, Daniel L et al. (2016) Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors. Memory 24:204-22
Maillet, David; Schacter, Daniel L (2016) Default Network and Aging: Beyond the Task-Negative Perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 20:646-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 145 publications