The present proposal aims at investigating age-related processes (memorial or executive) that contribute to the often-observed decline in working memory capacity. The working memory model we adopt is Cowan's (2001) hierarchical, embedded-process model, which has a limited-capacity focus of attention at its core. Our own recent work has shown that age differences in accuracy of working memory performance is often tied to overflow of the immediate focus of attention: Older adults lose information at a higher rate than younger adults when the task forces them to switch between processing and storage, although they are not slower at retrieving the information that is still available. In a series of experiments (most purely behavioral in nature, some including the study of event-related potentials [ERP]) we investigate the source of this increased information-loss. We investigate the following questions: 1. Are the control processes that are implicated in focus switching -- that is, coordination (dual-tasking between encoding and retrieval), resistance to interference (as revealed by the filtering efficiency in the contralateral delay activity component in ERP), and updating (as revealed by late components in ERP), as well as the attention switch itself (again investigated using ERP) -- age-sensitive? 2. Are the mechanisms of binding and unbinding objects into working memory age-sensitive? (This question will be investigated using time-accuracy functions, as well as by analyzing access to independent features and bound objects.) 3. Does age diminish the propensity for flexible control (Braver et al., 2007), as measured by proactive control and/or behavioral plasticity? (This will be investigated by manipulating the need for precise control and investigating whether this manipulation changes the strategic approach to the task as revealed by patterns of RT and/or accuracy, as well as by studies of prolonged practice.) The study will aid in a deeper understanding of the origins of age deficits tied to memory and of subject- initiated remediation, potentially leading to diagnostic instruments and/or sensible interventions.

Public Health Relevance

Older adults lose information at a faster rate than younger adults once the information leaves the immediate focus of attention. This proposal investigates whether this deficit is due to memory processes (retrieval, binding), executive control processes (coordination, updating, resistance to interference, attention switching), or both, and whether older adults are capable of flexible control over these processes. The study will aid in a deeper understanding of the origins of age deficits tied to memory and of subject-initiated remediation, potentially leading to diagnostic instruments and/or sensible interventions.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AG016201-15
Application #
8728082
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BBBP-D (06))
Program Officer
King, Jonathan W
Project Start
1998-12-01
Project End
2015-05-31
Budget Start
2014-06-15
Budget End
2015-05-31
Support Year
15
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$268,135
Indirect Cost
$85,507
Name
Georgia Institute of Technology
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
097394084
City
Atlanta
State
GA
Country
United States
Zip Code
30332
Sysoeva, Olga V; Lange, Elke B; Sorokin, Alexander B et al. (2015) From pre-attentive processes to durable representation: an ERP index of visual distraction. Int J Psychophysiol 95:310-21
Karbach, Julia; Verhaeghen, Paul (2014) Making working memory work: a meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychol Sci 25:2027-37
Pehlivanoglu, Didem; Jain, Shivangi; Ariel, Robert et al. (2014) The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces. Front Psychol 5:253
Price, John M; Colflesh, Gregory J H; Cerella, John et al. (2014) Making working memory work: the effects of extended practice on focus capacity and the processes of updating, forward access, and random access. Acta Psychol (Amst) 148:19-24
Verhaeghen, Paul; Zhang, Yanmin (2013) What is still working in working memory in old age: dual tasking and resistance to interference do not explain age-related item loss after a focus switch. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68:762-70
Duarte, Audrey; Hearons, Patricia; Jiang, Yashu et al. (2013) Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 50:465-76
Verhaeghen, Paul; Martin, Mike; Sedek, Grzegorz (2012) Reconnecting cognition in the lab and cognition in real life: The role of compensatory social and motivational factors in explaining how cognition ages in the wild. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 19:1-12
Zhang, Yanmin; Verhaeghen, Paul; Cerella, John (2012) Working memory at work: how the updating process alters the nature of working memory transfer. Acta Psychol (Amst) 139:77-83
Basak, Chandramallika; Verhaeghen, Paul (2011) Aging and switching the focus of attention in working memory: age differences in item availability but not in item accessibility. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66:519-26
Basak, Chandramallika; Verhaeghen, Paul (2011) Three layers of working memory: Focus-switch costs and retrieval dynamics as revealed by the N-count task. J Cogn Psychol (Hove) 23:204-219

Showing the most recent 10 out of 33 publications