The broad objective of the planned research is to improve clinical decision making with respect to the non-operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Bracing (the use of a spinal orthosis) is the standard of non- operativ care for children at high-risk for continued progression of scoliotic curvatures. The Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial has enrolled a representative cohort of 384 high-risk subjects being treated either by bracing or by watchful waiting across 25 participating institutions. Treatment assignment was via randomization for 40% of subjects and based on preference for the remainder. The renewal of this project will allow continued follow-up of all subjects to defined radiographic and skeletal maturity endpoints. The remaining subjects are anticipated to exit the study in Years 1 and 2 of this renewal;Year 3 will be devoted to finalization of the datasets, data analyses, and manuscript preparation.
The specific aims of BrAIST are to 1) compare the risk of curve progression to surgical threshold (e 50 degrees) in subjects treated by a brace to those treated by watchful waiting, 2) compare health and functioning, quality of life, and self- image over time in the two treatment groups, 3) determine the relationship between bracing dose (wear time) and curve response, and 4) to develop a predictive model for curve progression based on individual patient characteristics at initial presentation, and based on these characteristics, to estimate degree of risk reduction associated with the use of a brace. Clinical decision making will be improved by translation of these results into evidence-based prognosis and estimates of how the prognosis, specifically the risk of progressing to surgery, may be altered by the use of bracing.
The United States spends more than 60 million dollars per year on school screening programs for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The goal of screening is to identify children whose curves are still small enough to be treated with a brace, theoretically lowering their risk of needing spinal instrumentation and fusion. Despite the widespread use of bracing, in 2009 there were over 3600 discharges for idiopathic scoliosis fusion surgery;the total costs of which ranked second only to appendicitis among children aged 10 to 17 (~$514 million total;$137 million to Medicaid alone). 5. If this project indicates that bracing does not confer a significant benefit, screening programs can be abandoned and the resources directed to more effective public health efforts. If, on the other hand, bracing is effective in preventing he need for surgery, screening should continue and the most effective bracing practices should be identified and adopted across the United States.
|Schwieger, Traci; Campo, Shelly; Weinstein, Stuart L et al. (2017) Body Image and Quality of Life and Brace Wear Adherence in Females With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e519-e523|
|Schwieger, Traci; Campo, Shelly; Weinstein, Stuart L et al. (2016) Body Image and Quality-of-Life in Untreated Versus Brace-Treated Females With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:311-9|
|Khan, Irfan; Zimmerman, Bridget; Brophy, Patrick et al. (2014) Masking of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion: the isonatremic syndrome. J Pediatr 165:722-6|
|Weinstein, Stuart L; Dolan, Lori A; Wright, James G et al. (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 369:1512-21|
|Weinstein, Stuart L; Dolan, Lori A; Wright, James G et al. (2013) Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1832-41|