Our overall goals are to understand how eukaryotic cells, mammalian tissues and animals (including people) protect against the cytotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of alkylating agents present in our endogenous and exogenous environment. Alkylating agents are present as both naturally occurring and synthetic compounds. In addition they are commonly used in the cancer clinic for chemotherapy. Given that one in three people will be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetime (at least in the developed world) large numbers of people will be deliberately exposed to these toxic agents during chemotherapy. To gain an understanding of how eukaryotic cells respond to alkylating agents (and other agents) we have employed S. cerevisiae, cultured mammalian cells, and mouse model systems. We will continue to use these organisms in the next funding period.
Three Specific Aims are proposed, all of which represent a natural progression from a subset of our achievements in the previous funding period. Part of the first Specific Aim represents a continuation of the Genomic Phenotyping approach to understanding responses of eukaryotic cells to damaging agents;this was a new approach that we developed for screening a collection of ~ 4,800 S. cerevisiae strains, each deleted for a different non-essential gene. We now propose to extend this study to include the remaining 1,200 essential genes. Moreover we propose to extend this genomic scale analysis of yeast by systematically interrogating the subcellular localization of ~ 4,000 yeast proteins upon exposure to damaging agents. The second Specific Aim is designed to take the insights gained from our genomic studies of how S. cerevisae cells respond to damaging agents, and determine whether these insights are relevant in human cells. Specifically, we have found that in addition to DMArepair and cell cycle checkpoints, there are a number of hitherto unexpected cellular pathways that play equally important roles in helping cells recover from exposure to carcinogenic DMAdamaging agents.
We aim to establish whether these pathways are similarly important in human cells. Finally, in the third Specific Aim we will explore the notion that more DNA repair is not necessarily beneficial. In previous funding cycles we have found that imbalances within and between DNA repair pathways can cause increases in spontaneous mutation, and can sometimes lead to cells being sensitive to DNA damaging agents. More recently we found that expression of the human AAG 3-methyadenine DNA glycosylase in yeast and human cells creates a genomic instability phenotype. We will further explore the mechanism by which this instability is induced, and we will generate transgenic mice expressing AAG (and the mouse counterpart, Aag) to determine whether such an imbalance in DNA repair creates a cancer prone phenotype. The health relatedness of this project lies in the fact that it will contribute to our understanding of Cancer Etiology.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA055042-20
Application #
7766225
Study Section
Cancer Etiology Study Section (CE)
Program Officer
Okano, Paul
Project Start
1991-07-02
Project End
2013-02-28
Budget Start
2010-03-01
Budget End
2013-02-28
Support Year
20
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$428,283
Indirect Cost
Name
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department
Engineering (All Types)
Type
Schools of Engineering
DUNS #
001425594
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02139
Jordan, Jennifer J; Chhim, Sophea; Margulies, Carrie M et al. (2017) ALKBH7 drives a tissue and sex-specific necrotic cell death response following alkylation-induced damage. Cell Death Dis 8:e2947
Chaim, Isaac A; Nagel, Zachary D; Jordan, Jennifer J et al. (2017) In vivo measurements of interindividual differences in DNA glycosylases and APE1 activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E10379-E10388
Calvo, Jennifer A; Allocca, Mariacarmela; Fake, Kimberly R et al. (2016) Parp1 protects against Aag-dependent alkylation-induced nephrotoxicity in a sex-dependent manner. Oncotarget 7:44950-44965
Fu, Dragony; Samson, Leona D; Hübscher, Ullrich et al. (2015) The interaction between ALKBH2 DNA repair enzyme and PCNA is direct, mediated by the hydrophobic pocket of PCNA and perturbed in naturally-occurring ALKBH2 variants. DNA Repair (Amst) 35:13-8
Meira, Lisiane B; Calvo, Jennifer A; Shah, Dharini et al. (2014) Repair of endogenous DNA base lesions modulate lifespan in mice. DNA Repair (Amst) 21:78-86
Ebrahimkhani, Mohammad R; Daneshmand, Ali; Mazumder, Aprotim et al. (2014) Aag-initiated base excision repair promotes ischemia reperfusion injury in liver, brain, and kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E4878-86
Calvo, Jennifer A; Moroski-Erkul, Catherine A; Lake, Annabelle et al. (2013) Aag DNA glycosylase promotes alkylation-induced tissue damage mediated by Parp1. PLoS Genet 9:e1003413
Mazumder, Aprotim; Pesudo, Laia Quiros; McRee, Siobhan et al. (2013) Genome-wide single-cell-level screen for protein abundance and localization changes in response to DNA damage in S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9310-24
Mazumder, Aprotim; Tummler, Katja; Bathe, Mark et al. (2013) Single-cell analysis of ribonucleotide reductase transcriptional and translational response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 33:635-42
Svensson, J Peter; Quirós Pesudo, Laia; McRee, Siobhan K et al. (2013) Genomic phenotyping by barcode sequencing broadly distinguishes between alkylating agents, oxidizing agents, and non-genotoxic agents, and reveals a role for aromatic amino acids in cellular recovery after quinone exposure. PLoS One 8:e73736

Showing the most recent 10 out of 78 publications