Tobacco use remains the nation's leading preventable cause of death. High quality aggressive tobacco control programs not only prevent tobacco use and disease, but can be an important component of health care cost containment, a key policy concern at all levels of government and in the private sector. All tobacco control programs are not equally effective in terms of reducing smoking or health care costs savings per dollar spent. In addition, the tobacco industry works to stop or blunt these programs'effectiveness. This project will use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to accomplish three Specific Aims: 1. Document and analyze the variations in tobacco control policymaking and program implementation, including evolving tobacco industry strategies, in states with varying levels of success at developing and implementing tobacco control programs, to serve as the basis for recommendations to create the most effective and efficient tobacco control strategies and policies. 2. Define the relationships between state tobacco control program spending, smoking, and health care expenditures and use these relationships to quantify the effects of program intensity and quality. 3. Quantify the effects of tobacco control policies on smoking initiation, progression and cessation, and health disparities. We will pursue Aim 1 through a series of detailed case studies of the development and effects of state tobacco control policies and programs. We will pursue Aim 2 using modern econometric methods (based on cointegrating regressions) to quantify the effects of these programs on smoking behavior and, in turn, the effects of smoking on health care costs.
For Aims 2 and 3, we will merge national datasets (the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and the Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey) with policy data on clean indoor air laws, tobacco taxes, price and demographic variables to develop new models of smoking behavior that will provide a framework for understanding how these policies affect individual behavior and health disparities. The resulting knowledge will increase the likelihood of successfully developing and implementing effective tobacco control policies by providing information to public health officials and advocates on how to maximize program effectiveness and, equally important, understand how to ensure that health authorities use increasingly limited resources to support the most effective interventions.
Tobacco use remains the nation's leading preventable cause of death. High quality aggressive tobacco control programs not only prevent tobacco use and disease, but can be an important component of health care cost containment, a key policy concern at all levels of government and in the private sector. All tobacco control programs are not equally effective in terms of reducing smoking or health care costs savings per dollar spent. This research will contribute to our knowledge of how to maximize program effectiveness and, equally important, understand how to ensure that health authorities use increasingly limited resources to support and defend the most effective interventions.
|Fallin, Amanda; Roditis, Maria; Glantz, Stanton A (2015) Association of campus tobacco policies with secondhand smoke exposure, intention to smoke on campus, and attitudes about outdoor smoking restrictions. Am J Public Health 105:1098-100|
|Cheng, Kai-Wen; Okechukwu, Cassandra A; McMillen, Robert et al. (2015) Association between clean indoor air laws and voluntary smokefree rules in homes and cars. Tob Control 24:168-74|
|Dutra, Lauren M; Williams, David R; Kawachi, Ichiro et al. (2014) Racial and non-racial discrimination and smoking status among South African adults 10?years after apartheid. Tob Control 23:e114-21|
|Laposata, Elizabeth; Kennedy, Allison P; Glantz, Stanton A (2014) When tobacco targets direct democracy. J Health Polit Policy Law 39:537-64|
|Gonzalez, Mariaelena; Sanders-Jackson, Ashley; Glantz, Stanton A (2014) Association of strong smoke-free laws with dentists' advice to quit smoking, 2006-2007. Am J Public Health 104:e88-94|
|Apollonio, Dorie E; Glantz, Stanton A; Bero, Lisa A (2014) Term limits and the tobacco industry. Soc Sci Med 104:1-5|
|Lempert, Lauren K; Grana, Rachel; Glantz, Stanton A (2014) The importance of product definitions in US e-cigarette laws and regulations. Tob Control :|
|Sebrié, Ernesto Marcelo; Sandoya, Edgardo; Bianco, Eduardo et al. (2014) Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay: experience through 2010. Tob Control 23:471-2|
|Lee, John Tayu; Agrawal, Sutapa; Basu, Sanjay et al. (2014) Association between smoke-free workplace and second-hand smoke exposure at home in India. Tob Control 23:308-12|
|Nazar, Gaurang P; Lee, John Tayu; Glantz, Stanton A et al. (2014) Association between being employed in a smoke-free workplace and living in a smoke-free home: evidence from 15 low and middle income countries. Prev Med 59:47-53|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 126 publications