Type II topoisomerases are a ubiquitous class of proteins that use ATP to actively transport one DNA duplex through another. This reaction is essential for supercoiling homeostasis and resolving cytotoxic chromosome tangles prior to cell division. Type II topoisomerases are also targeted by drugs that serve as frontline clinical therapies for cancer and bacterial infections. The long-term objective of this proposal is to investigate the molecular basis of type II topoisomerase function and drug inhibition. Although rough framework for the catalytic cycle of these enzymes is in place, there remain many critical questions surrounding the mechanisms by which type II topoisomerases discriminate between different topological states of DNA, undergo allosteric transitions to drive DNA transport, and are inhibited by small molecule 'poisons' that stimulate DNA cleavage. Using a combination of structural, biochemical, and biophysical methods we aim to fill these gaps by: 1) Determining the structure of a 'poisoned' type II topoisomerase/DNA complex, 2) Establishing how a novel DNA binding and bending domain in bacterial type II topoisomerases controls substrate selectivity and functional output, and 3) Defining the molecular mechanisms and kinetics of DNA deformations and key structural rearrangements in the topoisomerase catalytic cycle. Our proposed studies will define the physical events by which type II topoisomerases facilitate the passage of one DNA segment through another to globally control DNA topology, and by which anticancer and antibacterial inhibitors subvert enzyme function. Data resulting from such efforts broadly impact a number of important scientific fronts, from understanding the dynamics of ATP-dependent molecular machines and regulation of chromosome superstructure, to defining the physical action of anti-topoisomerase therapies and aiding drug development.
Type II topoisomerases are molecular machines that disentangle DNA; as well as validated targets for frontline antibacterial and anticancer therapies. This proposal aims to understand the biochemistry and mechanics of the topoisomerase reaction; and to determine how some of the most widely-used anti-topoisomerase drugs block enzyme function.
|Hauk, Glenn; Berger, James M (2016) The role of ATP-dependent machines in regulating genome topology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 36:85-96|
|Aldred, Katie J; Blower, Tim R; Kerns, Robert J et al. (2016) Fluoroquinolone interactions with Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase: Enhancing drug activity against wild-type and resistant gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E839-46|
|Blower, Tim R; Williamson, Benjamin H; Kerns, Robert J et al. (2016) Crystal structure and stability of gyrase-fluoroquinolone cleaved complexes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:1706-13|
|Vos, Seychelle M; Lyubimov, Artem Y; Hershey, David M et al. (2014) Direct control of type IIA topoisomerase activity by a chromosomally encoded regulatory protein. Genes Dev 28:1485-97|
|Drlica, Karl; Mustaev, Arkady; Towle, Tyrell R et al. (2014) Bypassing fluoroquinolone resistance with quinazolinediones: studies of drug-gyrase-DNA complexes having implications for drug design. ACS Chem Biol 9:2895-904|
|Mustaev, Arkady; Malik, Muhammad; Zhao, Xilin et al. (2014) Fluoroquinolone-gyrase-DNA complexes: two modes of drug binding. J Biol Chem 289:12300-12|
|Kranzusch, Philip J; Lee, Amy S Y; Wilson, Stephen C et al. (2014) Structure-guided reprogramming of human cGAS dinucleotide linkage specificity. Cell 158:1011-21|
|Vos, Seychelle M; Lee, Imsang; Berger, James M (2013) Distinct regions of the Escherichia coli ParC C-terminal domain are required for substrate discrimination by topoisomerase IV. J Mol Biol 425:3029-45|
|Vos, Seychelle M; Stewart, Nichole K; Oakley, Martha G et al. (2013) Structural basis for the MukB-topoisomerase IV interaction and its functional implications in vivo. EMBO J 32:2950-62|
|Tretter, Elsa M; Berger, James M (2012) Mechanisms for defining supercoiling set point of DNA gyrase orthologs: II. The shape of the GyrA subunit C-terminal domain (CTD) is not a sole determinant for controlling supercoiling efficiency. J Biol Chem 287:18645-54|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 43 publications