For advanced cancer patients, from both societal and medical perspectives, many believe that the ideal decisions for care include participation in a well-designed clinical trial involving an investigational agent (i.e., phase I trial) and/or receiving high-quality palliative care, e.g., home hospice. However, despite the acceptance of these alternatives as ways of either improving future cancer care (in the case of phase I trials) or providing palliative care in an appropriate environment (as in hospice), they remain significantly underutilized. This relates to the difficult ethical issues, and overt dilemmas in the case of phase I trials, present in the advanced cancer patient care setting that create obstacles to effective communication and subsequent decision making. These obstacles include ineffective disclosure and understanding of the information necessary for such patients to set appropriate goals of care and make informed decisions. Building upon the involved investigators' prior efforts in examining the ethics of decision making among advanced cancer patients, the goals of this research project are to employ a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies to study the process of how and why advanced cancer patients seek information, e.g., regarding prognosis, and how they understand and use this information in the goal appraisal and decision-making processes. In addition, how oncologists communicate with advanced cancer patients about their illness, prognosis, and alternatives of care, and the obstacles present in achieving effective communication, will be studied. Such research will offer insights into engaging in effective communication with patients about complex issues, i.e., prognosis and participation in clinical research or hospice care. As well, data revealing areas of communication discomfort, or ineffective physician communication, should serve to explain the source of some patients' inaccurate conceptualizations of aspects of their care. Results from this research should highlight potential areas in need of improvement in physician-patient communication for both clinical care and clinical research. This research should also serve to suggest further areas of inquiry into the ethical aspects of the informed consent and decision-making processes, potentially improving the methods by which information, meaningful treatment choices and clinical research opportunities are made available to advanced cancer patients.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01CA087605-01A1
Application #
6383262
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-SNEM-4 (03))
Program Officer
Wu, Roy S
Project Start
2001-09-24
Project End
2004-08-31
Budget Start
2001-09-24
Budget End
2002-08-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$264,250
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Chicago
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
225410919
City
Chicago
State
IL
Country
United States
Zip Code
60637
Hlubocky, Fay J; Sachs, Greg A; Larson, Eric R et al. (2018) Do Patients With Advanced Cancer Have the Ability to Make Informed Decisions for Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials? J Clin Oncol 36:2483-2491
Hlubocky, Fay J; Kass, Nancy E; Roter, Debra et al. (2018) Investigator Disclosure and Advanced Cancer Patient Understanding of Informed Consent and Prognosis in Phase I Clinical Trials. J Oncol Pract 14:e357-e367
Daugherty, Christopher K; Hlubocky, Fay J (2008) What are terminally ill cancer patients told about their expected deaths? A study of cancer physicians'self-reports of prognosis disclosure. J Clin Oncol 26:5988-93
Gray, Stacy W; Hlubocky, Fay J; Ratain, Mark J et al. (2007) Attitudes toward research participation and investigator conflicts of interest among advanced cancer patients participating in early phase clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 25:3488-94
Hlubocky, Fay J; Ratain, Mark J; Wen, Ming et al. (2007) Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol 25:548-54
Daugherty, Christopher K; Fitchett, George; Murphy, Patricia E et al. (2005) Trusting God and medicine: spirituality in advanced cancer patients volunteering for clinical trials of experimental agents. Psychooncology 14:135-46
Daugherty, Christopher K; Steensma, David P (2003) Overcoming obstacles to hospice care: an ethical examination of inertia and inaction. J Clin Oncol 21:42s-45s
Helft, Paul R; Hlubocky, Fay; Daugherty, Christopher K (2003) American oncologists' views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol 21:942-7
Helft, Paul R; Hlubocky, Fay; Wen, Ming et al. (2003) Associations among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping in patients with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trials. Support Care Cancer 11:644-51