Evidence-based preventive services for the early detection of cancer and other health conditions offer profound health benefits, yet Americans receive only half of indicated services. Government and specialty society policy initiatives are promoting the adoption of information technologies to engage patients in their care, such as personal health records (PHRs), but the current functionality may not fully utilize the technology's potential. We developed a theory-driven interactive PHR that uses its higher functionality to more deeply engage patients in health promotion. The model defines five levels of PHR functionality: (1) collecting patient information, (2) integrating with electronic health records (EHRs), (3) translating information into lay language, (4) providing individualized, guideline-based clinical recommendations, and (5) facilitating patient action. We hypothesize that implementing PHRs with these higher levels of functionality will inform and activate patients in ways that simpler PHRs cannot achieve and will increase uptake of preventive services. However, realizing this vision in practice requires both technological upgrades and practice engagement. Our prior work in Virginia practices demonstrated that patients who used such a system were more up-to-date with preventive care. We now propose a 2-phase trial to evaluate whether this functionality is scalable across a large number of practices and how its uptake differs for minority and disadvantaged patients. In Phase 1 (years 2-3), we will randomize 46 practices from three practice-based research networks in eight states to implement a PHR with advanced versus simpler functionality. Control practices will use their existing PHR. Intervention practices will upgrade their PHR to feature an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) that we have previously developed and tested. Intervention practices will locally tailor the IPHR content and learn how to integrate new functions into practice. Phase 1 will feature an implementation assessment in intervention practices, based on the RE-AIM model, to measure Reach (creation of IPHR accounts by patients), Adoption (practice decision to use the IPHR), Implementation (consistency, fidelity, barriers, and facilitators of use), and Maintenance (sustained use). The randomized comparison of intervention and control practices will measure the incremental effect of the IPHR on shared decision-making and receipt of cancer screening tests compared to traditional PHRs (Effectiveness). Data sources will include the EHR/PHR/IPHR databases, patient and practice surveys, field notes, practice learning collaborative transcripts, practice diaries, and patient focus groups that oversample minorities. In Phase 2 (years 4-5), the networks will offer the IPHR to all (up to 278) non-intervention practices to observe whether the networks can implement the IPHR more broadly (Scalability). This study will inform future efforts to use patient-centered information technology to promote cancer prevention and the feasibility of national dissemination.
Cancer screening can improve the length and quality of life, yet the average American receives only half of recommended services. Patient-centered personal health records with higher levels of functionality, combined with practice redesign to make use of these functions, can help patients obtain recommended cancer screening tests by linking them to their doctor's records, explaining information in lay language, displaying tailored recommendations and educational resources, providing logistical support and tools to stimulate action, and generating reminders. This project will measure whether making these resources available to primary care practices and patients promotes shared decision-making and increases the delivery of cancer screening compared to existing information systems.
|Alpert, Jordan M; Krist, Alex H; Aycock, Rebecca A et al. (2017) Designing User-Centric Patient Portals: Clinician and Patients' Uses and Gratifications. Telemed J E Health 23:248-253|
|Woolf, Steven H; Zimmerman, Emily; Haley, Amber et al. (2016) Authentic Engagement Of Patients And Communities Can Transform Research, Practice, And Policy. Health Aff (Millwood) 35:590-4|
|Hochheimer, Camille J; Sabo, Roy T; Krist, Alex H et al. (2016) Methods for Evaluating Respondent Attrition in Web-Based Surveys. J Med Internet Res 18:e301|
|Wallace, Lorraine S; Angier, Heather; Huguet, Nathalie et al. (2016) Patterns of Electronic Portal Use among Vulnerable Patients in a Nationwide Practice-based Research Network: From the OCHIN Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 29:592-603|
|Alpert, Jordan M; Desens, Linda; Krist, Alex H et al. (2016) Measuring Health Literacy Levels of a Patient Portal Using the CDC's Clear Communication Index. Health Promot Pract :|
|Krist, Alex H (2015) Electronic health record innovations for healthier patients and happier doctors. J Am Board Fam Med 28:299-302|
|Krist, Alex H; Green, Lee A; Phillips, Robert L et al. (2015) Health information technology needs help from primary care researchers. J Am Board Fam Med 28:306-10|
|Krist, Alex H; Aycock, Rebecca A; Etz, Rebecca S et al. (2014) MyPreventiveCare: implementation and dissemination of an interactive preventive health record in three practice-based research networks serving disadvantaged patients--a randomized cluster trial. Implement Sci 9:181|