Cigarette smoking, like other forms of drug dependence, poses a significant health threat in the United States. Public awareness campaigns have expanded the public's knowledge of the consequences of cigarette smoking, and the majority of smokers express a desire to quit. However, the vast majority of smokers fail in their attempts to abstain from cigarette smoking;a failure of self-control. Our long-term goal is to further knowledge about the variables that influence failures of self-control in an effort to facilitate the development of comprehensive treatment programs for dependence on cigarettes and other drugs of abuse. We will examine the phenomenon of failed abstinence efforts in the context of preference reversals, a phenomenon where a larger and more-delayed reward is preferred to a smaller but less-delayed when both outcomes are temporally distal, but switches to the smaller reward as time passes and both rewards become more proximal. These preference reversals may provide a framework for understanding why a cigarette smoker plans to quit smoking, but fails to initiate or maintain a quit attempt. A mechanism called soft commitment has been proposed to prevent these preference reversals, where repeated choice for the larger, more-delayed reward while the reward is distal develops response persistence for that alternative that is maintained even as the reward becomes more proximal. We hypothesize that a soft commitment mechanism can prevent or limit preference reversals.
In Specific Aim 1, we will determine if cigarette smokers exhibit earlier preference reversals than nonsmokers.
In Specific Aim 2, we will compare different models of delay discounting on their ability to predict the temporal location of preference reversal.
In Specific Aim 3, we will examine the efficacy of a soft commitment procedure in preventing preference reversals in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.
In Specific Aim 4, we will determine the efficacy of soft commitment procedures when a cigarette smoker is experiencing nicotine withdrawal. If soft commitment does prevent preference reversals in human cigarette smokers, such procedures might be modified to prevent preference reversals when the preference reversal results in failures of abstinence attempts.
Cigarette smoking is a significant concern in the United States, continuing to be the most preventable cause of mortality and morbidity. Though many smokers want to quit, a very small minority are able to abstain from smoking for any substantial time period. This research may provide new insights into the variables that affect the failures of self-control that characterize failed attempts to abstain from cigarettes in particular and drugs of abuse in general, leading to new modules of treatment that target an individual's time of vulnerability to relapse.
|Kuang, Jinyi; Milhorn, Hannah; Stuppy-Sullivan, Allison et al. (2018) Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 26:503-508|
|Stuppy-Sullivan, Allison M; Tormohlen, Kayla N; Yi, Richard (2016) Exchanging the liquidity hypothesis: Delay discounting of money and self-relevant non-money rewards. Behav Processes 122:16-20|
|Yi, Richard; Pickover, Alison; Stuppy-Sullivan, Allison M et al. (2016) Impact of episodic thinking on altruism. J Exp Soc Psychol 65:74-81|
|Yi, Richard; Matusiewicz, Alexis K; Tyson, Antonio (2016) Delay Discounting and Preference Reversals by Cigarette Smokers. Psychol Rec 66:235-242|
|Matusiewicz, Alexis K; Carter, Anne E; Landes, Reid D et al. (2013) Statistical equivalence and test-retest reliability of delay and probability discounting using real and hypothetical rewards. Behav Processes 100:116-22|
|Charlton, Shawn R; Yi, Richard; Porter, Caitlin et al. (2013) Now for Me, Later for Us? Effects of Group Context on Temporal Discounting. J Behav Decis Mak 26:118-127|
|Yi, Richard; Landes, Reid D (2012) Temporal and probability discounting by cigarette smokers following acute smoking abstinence. Nicotine Tob Res 14:547-58|
|Sheffer, Christine; Mackillop, James; McGeary, John et al. (2012) Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers. Am J Addict 21:221-32|
|Yi, Richard; Carter, Anne E; Landes, Reid D (2012) Restricted psychological horizon in active methamphetamine users: future, past, probability, and social discounting. Behav Pharmacol 23:358-66|
|Bickel, Warren K; Yi, Richard; Landes, Reid D et al. (2011) Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry 69:260-5|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 41 publications