Contingency management programs effectively treat many substance abusers. At the same time, typical contingency management programs are ineffective for many others. By definition, when contingency management fails it is a result of ineffective reinforcement of abstinence; in practice, we find these failures often occur when patients never contact the programmed consequences of abstinence. In many settings, shaping desired behavior by reinforcing successive approximations of the target behavior is a standard method for overcoming this problem. However, shaping has been infrequently examined in drug abuse treatment. In the past, such investigation was hampered by the lack of standardized methods for shaping behavior. Percentile schedules are a standardized, replicable, and effective means of shaping behavior; and thus, percentile schedules can be used to study shaping. This project uses percentile schedules to test the concept that effective shaping procedures will improve the outcomes seen with typical contingency management treatments, and that this improvement will result from shaping abstinence in those individuals unlikely to initiate periods of abstinence of sufficient length to earn the programmed reward. This concept is tested in two studies of smokers planning to quit. The initial study evaluates four versions of the percentile schedule shaping procedure to establish which best facilitates abstinence. The main study compares the outcomes of three groups. On one day prior to group assignment, participants are offered a financial incentive if they abstain from smoking. Participants are classified as hard-to-treat if they fail to earn this incentive, and group assignment is blocked on this variable. The first group receives contingency management treatment using a percentile schedule. The second receives standard contingency management treatment, reinforcing periods of abstinence sufficient to meet a strict fixed breath CO criterion. The third is a yoked control group receiving payments based on the earnings of subjects under the percentile schedule. This design allows the comparison of a shaping contingency management procedure to a standard procedure, and to the effects of non-contingent payments. These studies begin to address the critical problem of reducing the frequent failures of even the most effective treatments for substance abuse.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA013304-03
Application #
6379036
Study Section
Human Development Research Subcommittee (NIDA)
Program Officer
Grossman, Debra
Project Start
1999-09-25
Project End
2004-08-31
Budget Start
2001-09-01
Budget End
2002-08-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$322,251
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
800772162
City
San Antonio
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
78229
Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, R J (2015) The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence. J Appl Behav Anal 48:25-37
Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, R J (2014) The effects of percentile versus fixed criterion schedules on smoking with equal incentive magnitude for initial abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 22:348-55
Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, R J (2013) The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation. Addict Behav 38:2084-8
Javors, M A; Hatch, J P; Lamb, R J (2011) Sequential combination of self-report, breath carbon monoxide, and saliva cotinine to assess smoking status. Drug Alcohol Depend 113:242-4
Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, R J (2010) Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit. J Appl Behav Anal 43:357-67
Lamb, R J; Kirby, Kimberly C; Morral, Andrew R et al. (2010) Shaping smoking cessation in hard-to-treat smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:62-71
Amodei, Nancy; Lamb, R J (2010) The role of nicotine replacement therapy in early quitting success. Nicotine Tob Res 12:1-10
Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, R J (2010) The relationship between in-treatment abstinence and post-treatment abstinence in a smoking cessation treatment. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 18:32-6
Romanowich, Paul; Mintz, Jim; Lamb, R J (2009) The relationship between self-efficacy and reductions in smoking in a contingency management procedure. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 17:139-45
Lamb, R J; Morral, Andrew R; Kirby, Kimberly C et al. (2007) Contingencies for change in complacent smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:245-55

Showing the most recent 10 out of 16 publications