? Quality improvement (Ql) methods are a cornerstone of business and healthcare management throughout the United States yet there have been few studies of Ql interventions in addiction treatment settings. The proposed study tests the effectiveness of one Ql system - Patient Feedback (PF) - at increasing outpatient group therapy attendance and self-reported abstinence. The feasibility and acceptability of PF was established in a six-site study conducted within the National Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. In the proposed study, 32 community-based outpatient treatment programs with approximately 250 clinicians will be randomly assigned to PF, or usual clinic practices. In the PF condition, every other week clinic patients are invited to complete a 12-item, self-administered survey in which they rate therapeutic alliance and treatment satisfaction, and report past week substance use. These anonymous surveys are faxed by clinic staff to a University of Pennsylvania data center where a custom software application converts the surveys into feedback reports and posts them to a password protected website. Clinicians can access their caseload feedback reports and aggregated reports for the whole clinic; supervisors can only access the aggregated clinic reports. On a monthly basis staff meet as a team to review the feedback reports and develop Ql plans intended to yield improvements in select Ql indicators. The PF website and the monthly PF e-newsletter provide social recognition, clinical resources, and a virtual community for participating clinicians. After 20- weeks, participants in both conditions complete follow-up measures and then both groups are given open access to PF for 12 additional months. During """"""""sustainability phase"""""""" staff usage of the PF website is monitored. Alternate versions of the PF Survey are introduced during the sustainability study, including one that monitors HIV risk behavior and one developed collaboratively by staff from the participating sites. The rapid processing of surveys enables near real time feedback to clinic staff. Organizations may share their feedback reports with funding sources, regulatory agencies, policy makers, and other stakeholders. This centralized, semi-automated feedback system eases fulfillment of accreditation requirements and as such, reduces the cost of clinic operations. A collaborating clinical trial application for this test of PF is being submitted by John Rotrosen, M.D., from New York University, School of Medicine. ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01DA020799-01
Application #
7028207
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1-RXL-E (30))
Program Officer
Hilton, Thomas
Project Start
2006-05-22
Project End
2009-04-30
Budget Start
2006-05-22
Budget End
2007-04-30
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$511,346
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Crits-Christoph, Paul; Markell, Hannah M; Gallop, Robert et al. (2015) Predicting outcome of substance abuse treatment in a feedback study: Can recovery curves be improved upon? Psychother Res 25:694-704
Crits-Christoph, Paul; Ring-Kurtz, Sarah; Hamilton, Jessica L et al. (2012) A preliminary study of the effects of individual patient-level feedback in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. J Subst Abuse Treat 42:301-9
Crits-Christoph, Paul; Hamilton, Jessica L; Ring-Kurtz, Sarah et al. (2011) Program, counselor, and patient variability in the alliance: a multilevel study of the alliance in relation to substance use outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat 40:405-13
Crits-Christoph, Paul; Ring-Kurtz, Sarah; McClure, Bridget et al. (2010) A randomized controlled study of a web-based performance improvement system for substance abuse treatment providers. J Subst Abuse Treat 38:251-62
Worley, Matthew; Gallop, Robert; Gibbons, Mary Beth Connolly et al. (2008) Additional treatment services in a cocaine treatment study: level of services obtained and impact on outcome. Am J Addict 17:209-17