? Addiction treatment is often characterized by long delays between first contact and treatment as well as high no-show and drop out rates leading to unused capacity in apparently full agencies. Patients do not get needed care and agency financial stability is threatened. The Network for Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) is a high-intensity improvement collaborative of 39 addiction treatment agencies distributed across 25 states. Over the past three years, NIATx has substantially improved time to treatment, no-show rates, admission to, and continuation in treatment by making improvements to organizational processes (such as first contact, intake and assessment, engagement, level of care transitions, paperwork, social support, outreach, and scheduling). While the results are very encouraging, they have, by intent, been obtained from a select group of agencies using a high-cost combination of services. A more practical diffusion model is needed to spread process improvements across the spectrum of treatment agencies. This is a resubmission of an application to conduct a randomized trial to test the effectiveness and cost of less expensive combinations of the services that make up the NIATx collaborative (Web site, interest circles, coach calls, coach visits and learning sessions). This RCT will randomly assign 240 treatment agencies in 5 states to six experimental arms, including a control group. It will have two primary aims: 1) Determine whether a state-based strategy can (with NIATx support) lead mainstream treatment agencies to implement and sustain process changes that improve the study's Primary Outcomes: time to treatment, no-show rates, admissions to, and continuation in treatment; and 2) Evaluate the effectiveness and cost of five combinations of the services making up NIATx. Secondary outcomes include impact of the study arms on treatment completion, status of innovations attempted, impact of study arms on particular innovations, employee turnover, contribution to margin, organization-wide readiness to implement and sustain process innovations. This study should create a practical model for improving efficiency and effectiveness of addiction treatment. ? ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA020832-02
Application #
7294356
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1-GXM-A (23))
Program Officer
Hilton, Thomas
Project Start
2006-09-30
Project End
2011-05-31
Budget Start
2007-06-01
Budget End
2008-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$1,860,642
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Wisconsin Madison
Department
Miscellaneous
Type
Schools of Engineering
DUNS #
161202122
City
Madison
State
WI
Country
United States
Zip Code
53715
Johnson, Kimberly; Quanbeck, Andrew; Maus, Adam et al. (2015) Influence networks among substance abuse treatment clinics: implications for the dissemination of innovations. Transl Behav Med 5:260-8
Grazier, Kyle L; Quanbeck, Andrew R; Oruongo, John et al. (2015) What Influences Participation in QI? A Randomized Trial of Addiction Treatment Organizations. J Healthc Qual 37:342-53
Ford 2nd, James H; Wise, Meg; Krahn, Dean et al. (2014) Family care map: Sustaining family-centered care in Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers. J Rehabil Res Dev 51:1311-24
Wallace, Neal T; McConnell, K John (2013) Impact of comprehensive insurance parity on follow-up care after psychiatric inpatient treatment in Oregon. Psychiatr Serv 64:961-6
Gustafson, David H; Quanbeck, Andrew R; Robinson, James M et al. (2013) Which elements of improvement collaboratives are most effective? A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction 108:1145-57
Choi, Dongseok; Hoffman, Kim A; Kim, Mi-Ok et al. (2013) A high-resolution analysis of process improvement: use of quantile regression for wait time. Health Serv Res 48:333-47
Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje; Ingel, Katharina; Schneider, Astrid (2013) Sample size in cluster-randomized trials with time to event as the primary endpoint. Stat Med 32:739-51
Quanbeck, Andrew; Wheelock, Anna; Ford 2nd, James H et al. (2013) Examining access to addiction treatment: scheduling processes and barriers. J Subst Abuse Treat 44:343-8
Quanbeck, Andrew R; Madden, Lynn; Edmundson, Eldon et al. (2012) A business case for quality improvement in addiction treatment: evidence from the NIATx collaborative. J Behav Health Serv Res 39:91-100
Gustafson, David H (2012) Essential Ingredients for Successful Redesign of Addiction Treatment. Bridge (Kans City) 2:

Showing the most recent 10 out of 21 publications