We employ functional MRI and lesion methods to map cortical systems supporting the perception and comprehension of auditory language. The studies are theoretically guided on the broadest scale by our dorsal-ventral framework for the neural organization of language, which holds that the majority of computational systems supporting language comprehension (the ventral stream) are located in the temporal lobe. We target three broad computational systems: (1) phonological-level systems, (2) sentence-level systemss, and (3) lexical-semantic-level systems which are juxtaposed between, and interact with (1) &(2). Thus, the present proposal aims to map the large-scale landscape of language perception/comprehension systems.
Aim 1 : To map cortical regions supporting phonological-level processes, their interaction with lexical-semantic systems, and their relation to non-linguistic processes. A major goal is to distinguish systems supporting sublexical (segmental) and lexical (word) stages of phonological processing/representation. Experiments proposed in this section are guided by the following hypotheses, (i) Sublexical processes are computed on dorsal aspects of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) whereas lexical- level phonological processes involve ventral aspects of the STG. (ii)Neural structures in the posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), interface lexical-phonological systems with widely distributed lexical- semantic networks, (iii)Phonological systems, both sublexical and lexical, are bilaterally organized, while the proposed phonological-semantic interface system is more left dominant.
Aim 2 : To map cortical regions supporting sentence-level processes, their interaction with lexical-semantic systems, and their interaction with non-linguistic processes. Experiments proposed in this section are guided by the following hypotheses, (i) Sentence-level processes involve fields in the anterior temporal lobe (ATL), and interacts with lexical- semantic networks via a posterior temporal lobe interface network, (ii)Processing phrasal prosody involves anterior portions of the STG, whereas syntactic processes involve more ventral anterior STS/MTG regions, (iii) Systems supporting the processing of phrasal prosody share neural territory with non-linguistic auditory processes (e.g..music), whereas syntactic processes are carried out in circumscribed and domain-specific brain regions.
|Matchin, William G (2017) A neuronal retuning hypothesis of sentence-specificity in Broca's area. Psychon Bull Rev :|
|Sullivan, Natalie; Walenski, Matthew; Love, Tracy et al. (2017) The comprehension of sentences with unaccusative verbs in aphasia: a test of the intervener hypothesis. Aphasiology 31:67-81|
|Matchin, William; Hickok, Gregory (2016) 'Syntactic Perturbation' During Production Activates the Right IFG, but not Broca's Area or the ATL. Front Psychol 7:241|
|Walker, Grant M; Hickok, Gregory (2016) Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM). Psychon Bull Rev 23:339-52|
|Kodumuri, Nishanth; Sebastian, Rajani; Davis, Cameron et al. (2016) The association of insular stroke with lesion volume. Neuroimage Clin 11:41-5|
|Venezia, Jonathan H; Thurman, Steven M; Matchin, William et al. (2016) Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data. Atten Percept Psychophys 78:583-601|
|Binder, Jeffrey R; Pillay, Sara B; Humphries, Colin J et al. (2016) Surface errors without semantic impairment in acquired dyslexia: a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study. Brain 139:1517-26|
|Poeppel, David; Hickok, Gregory (2015) Electromagnetic recording of the auditory system. Handb Clin Neurol 129:245-55|
|Hendrickson, Kristi; Walenski, Matthew; Friend, Margaret et al. (2015) The organization of words and environmental sounds in memory. Neuropsychologia 69:67-76|
|Tippett, Donna C (2015) Update in Aphasia Research. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 15:49|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 90 publications