In one of the newest applications of cochlear implants, individuals with bilateral low-frequency hearing receive a short electrode array in one cochlea with the aim of preserving hearing in that ear. A successful surgical outcome allows patients to combine electrical (E) stimulation from the implanted ear and acoustic stimulation (S) from both ears or EAS. The long-term goal of this research is to quantify the benefit of acoustic hearing from two partially hearing ears vs. one partially hearing ear - as in the case of bimodal hearing. Previous research has failed to demonstrate significant benefit to speech perception for EAS with two partially hearing ears vs. one partially hearing ear. The standard clinical measures that have been used to assess benefit, however, have not been designed to assess binaural listening. Thus the proposed research will test two groups of patients including (1) EAS recipients, and (2) patients with a conventional electrode array in one ear and low-frequency hearing in the other ear (i.e., bimodal). Experimentation will include complex listening environments which are thought to be sensitive to the use of binaural cues including the spatial separation of speech and noise, reverberation, and localization. The clinical application of this proposal is substantial. Neither audiologists nor otologists are certain how to counsel EAS-qualifying patients about treatment options. This project will provide the necessary information to allow for data-driven counseling.
Combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) with a short electrode array offers a viable treatment option for individuals who do not receive benefit from hearing aids and may not qualify for a cochlear implant due to residual low-frequency hearing. It is critical, however, that both patients and professionals understand the benefits of preserving hearing in the implanted ear as well as the relative benefits of EAS (cochlear implant + binaural acoustic hearing) vs. bimodal hearing (cochlear implant + contralateral acoustic hearing). The current proposal aims to develop this information and, as a consequence, will enable appropriate informed consent for a treatment option that could become a standard surgical tool in the effort to restore hearing to the partially deaf.
|Gifford, René H; Davis, Timothy J; Sunderhaus, Linsey W et al. (2017) Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty. Ear Hear 38:539-553|
|Sheffield, Sterling W; Simha, Michelle; Jahn, Kelly N et al. (2016) The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing. Ear Hear 37:282-8|
|Labadie, Robert F; Noble, Jack H; Hedley-Williams, Andrea J et al. (2016) Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol 37:137-45|
|Sweeney, Alex D; Hunter, Jacob B; Carlson, Matthew L et al. (2016) Durability of Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation with Conventional-Length Electrodes and Scala Tympani Insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:907-13|
|Loiselle, Louise H; Dorman, Michael F; Yost, William A et al. (2016) Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 59:810-8|
|Loiselle, Louise H; Dorman, Michael F; Yost, William A et al. (2015) Sound source localization by hearing preservation patients with and without symmetrical low-frequency acoustic hearing. Audiol Neurootol 20:166-71|
|Zeitler, Daniel M; Dorman, Michael F; Natale, Sarah J et al. (2015) Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Single-sided Deaf Listeners After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 36:1467-71|
|Dorman, Michael F; Zeitler, Daniel; Cook, Sarah J et al. (2015) Interaural level difference cues determine sound source localization by single-sided deaf patients fit with a cochlear implant. Audiol Neurootol 20:183-8|
|Sheffield, Sterling W; Jahn, Kelly; Gifford, René H (2015) Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception. J Am Acad Audiol 26:145-54|
|Wanna, George B; Noble, Jack H; Gifford, Rene H et al. (2015) Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results. Otol Neurotol 36:1343-8|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 31 publications