Many studies have revealed distortions in the visual perception of the distance and shape of objects. In view of this, how do people successfully reach to grasp objects? The stability of reaching is also at issue because reaching drifts without haptic feedback from contact with objects. Previously, the investigators have argued that calibration is an essential component of definite distance perception. However, studies of haptic shape perception have also revealed distortions in perceived shape. They will investigate how haptic and visual perception of egocentric distance and shape are combined to allow stable and accurate reaching and grasping. Target spheres will be viewed by participants and then removed by the experimenter before the participant performs blind reaches. Participants will reach to locations at small exocentric distances to the front, back, top, or bottom of a target sphere or reach to location on the surface of the sphere itself. In some conditions, participants will be allowed haptic feedback and in other not. They will investigate stability based on haptic information along and whether vision destabilizes reaching once haptic feedback is removed. They will investigate if the presence of a continuous visible surface facilitates generalization of haptic calibration across reach space. The investigators will examine whether grasping allows greater accuracy and stability than reaching. Finally, they will investigate monocular optic flow generated by head movement. Twenty percent of the general population is estimated to be effectively monocular. The best monocular perception of distance is achieved via optic flow generated by self-motion. They will use head mounted computer graphics displays to rescale the relation between optic flow and self-motion and use the rescaling to investigate the locus and specificity of calibration. This program of research is unique in it attention to both the perceptual and motor side of manual activity and to the inherently multimodal character of spatial behavior. By studying the integrated function of vision and haptics and motor control the investigators hope to generate fundamental understanding of functionally effective spatial behaviors.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01EY011741-02
Application #
2856963
Study Section
Perception and Cognition Review Committee (PEC)
Project Start
1998-01-01
Project End
2001-05-31
Budget Start
1999-01-01
Budget End
2001-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1999
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Indiana University Bloomington
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
006046700
City
Bloomington
State
IN
Country
United States
Zip Code
47401
Bingham, Geoffrey P; Pan, Jing S; Mon-Williams, Mark A (2014) Calibration is both functional and anatomical. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 40:61-70
Coats, Rachel O; Pan, Jing S; Bingham, Geoffrey P (2014) Perturbation of perceptual units reveals dominance hierarchy in cross calibration. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 40:328-41
Pan, Jing S; Coats, Rachel O; Bingham, Geoffrey P (2014) Calibration is action specific but perturbation of perceptual units is not. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 40:404-15
Bingham, Geoffrey P; Mon-Williams, Mark A (2013) The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements. J Neurophysiol 110:2857-62
Bingham, Geoffrey P; Lind, Mats (2008) Large continuous perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for accurate perception of metric shape. Percept Psychophys 70:524-40
Mon-Williams, Mark; Bingham, Geoffrey P (2007) Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:645-56
Bingham, Geoffrey P; Crowell, James A; Todd, James T (2004) Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space. Percept Psychophys 66:152-69
Bingham, G P; Bradley, A; Bailey, M et al. (2001) Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1314-34
Bingham, G P; McConnell, D S; Muchisky, M M (2001) Commentary on Jacobs and Michaels (2001): calibration and perceptual learning in event perception. Percept Psychophys 63:572-4
Bingham, G P; Zaal, F; Robin, D et al. (2000) Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1436-60

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications