Several researchers have hypothesized that the visual analysis of human movement differs fundamentally from other motion analyses. However, to date, no studies have systematically examined how the perception of human movement differs from the perception of other complex motions. As a result, the mechanism underlying the visual perception of human movement remains largely unknown. To resolve this issue, three converging lines of investigation are proposed. The goal of the first series of psychophysical experiments is to systematically define the visual system's sensitivity to human movement. In the second investigative approach, visual sensitivity to human movement will be compared with visual sensitivity to other complex motions. Only once these two data sets have been collected can one directly test whether the visual analysis of human movement truly differs from other motion analyses. The goal of the final line of investigation is to ascertain whether the visual analysis of human movement depends upon motor experience. That is, do we visually interpret the movements of others in terms of our own motor system? Or, is the visual analysis of human movement dependent upon extensive visual exposure to this movement? The results of these experiments will allow us to construct, for the very first time, a comprehensive model of the visual analysis of human movement. Such a model will have significant implications for our understanding of the interaction between the motor and visual systems. Moreover, these results will challenge current theories of processing specialization and, as a result, assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with localized lesions in late visual areas.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01EY012300-01A1
Application #
2841014
Study Section
Visual Sciences B Study Section (VISB)
Project Start
1999-04-01
Project End
2002-03-31
Budget Start
1999-04-01
Budget End
2000-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
1999
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Rutgers University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
130029205
City
Newark
State
NJ
Country
United States
Zip Code
07102
Sebanz, Natalie; Shiffrar, Maggie (2009) Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychon Bull Rev 16:170-5
Prasad, Sapna; Shiffrar, Maggie (2009) Viewpoint and the recognition of people from their movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:39-49
Oh, Songjoo; Shiffrar, Maggie (2008) Rolling perception without rolling motion. Perception 37:317-20
Virji-Babul, Naznin; Cheung, Teresa; Weeks, Daniel et al. (2007) Neural activity involved in the perception of human and meaningful object motion. Neuroreport 18:1125-8
Blake, Randolph; Shiffrar, Maggie (2007) Perception of human motion. Annu Rev Psychol 58:47-73
Funk, Marion; Shiffrar, Maggie; Brugger, Peter (2005) Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception. Exp Brain Res 164:341-6
Jacobs, Alissa; Shiffrar, Maggie (2005) Walking perception by walking observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:157-69
Jacobs, Alissa; Pinto, Jeannine; Shiffrar, Maggie (2004) Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:822-35
Thornton, Ian M; Rensink, Ronald A; Shiffrar, Maggie (2002) Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception 31:837-53
Booth, Amy E; Bertenthal, Bennett I; Pinto, Jeannine (2002) Perception of the symmetrical patterning of human gait by infants. Dev Psychol 38:554-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications