We live in a complicated world, with far more visual information available to us at any given time than the brain can handle. Attention is the selection process by which the brain chooses certain objects in the world in order to deal more effectively with them. In order to make accurate movements toward or away from attended objects the brain must have a spatially accurate representation of them. The parietal cortex has long been thought to be important in solving both of these problems, describing the visual world in an accurate way for the generation of attention and movement. One area of the parietal cortex, the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) has been described as being important in both the generation of eye movements and the generation of visual attention. We have discovered that LIP describes a spatially accurate salience or priority map which can be used simultaneously by the visual system to describe the locus of attention and by the oculomotor system to choose a goal for a rapid eye movement (saccade) when a saccade is appropriate. Two broad questions arise about this map: 1) what is its coordinate system and 2) how does it remain spatially accurate despite a moving eye? This proposal has three specific aims arising out of recent discoveries in our laboratory, which attack these general questions.
Aim 1) when the brain analyzes the visual world it does so in a coordinate frame which can be visual, e.g. the location an object on the retina or in the world, or motor, the amplitude of the saccade necessary to acquire that object.
Aim 1 uses the technique of saccadic adaptation, which enables us to separate the amplitude of a saccade from the target which evoked it. One way in which the brain maintains spatial accuracy is by using the metrics of a planned or recently completed saccade to remap the visual representation in LIP areas. We will also use saccadic adaptation to evaluate the metrics of the eye movement vector that shifts the receptive field.
Aim 2) The other way that the brain can generate a spatially accurate representation is by actually measuring eye position. We have discovered a proprioceptive representation of eye position in monkey primary somatosensory cortex. However, if this signal is too slow it could not be used for the description of the world for action.
Aim 2 is to study the time course of this signal, and see how it relates to eye position signals in LIP.
Aim 3) Humans and monkeys can make accurate eye movements to targets which appear and disappear before an intervening eye movement, but they also slightly mislocalize saccade targets flashed immediately around saccades.
Aim 3 is to study the spatial and temporal courses of the remapping process and the effects of inactivation of LIP to ascertain if the remapping mechanism can provide the mechanism by which humans can make fairly accurate but not perfect saccades to stimuli which appear and disappear around the time of a saccade.

Public Health Relevance

Spatial processing is impaired in human patients with parietal and frontal lesions. Answering the questions posed in these specific aims will lead to a greater understanding of how the cerebral cortex orders the processes of visual attention and spatial perception. This in turn will lead to insight into the visual and oculomotor deficits that are so devastating in humans with lesions of frontal and parietal cortex, and will aid the designing of diagnostic, prognostic, and rehabilitative strategies.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01EY014978-10
Application #
8515417
Study Section
Central Visual Processing Study Section (CVP)
Program Officer
Steinmetz, Michael A
Project Start
2003-08-01
Project End
2014-07-31
Budget Start
2013-08-01
Budget End
2014-07-31
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$367,080
Indirect Cost
$139,080
Name
Columbia University (N.Y.)
Department
Neurosciences
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
621889815
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10032
Krishna, B Suresh; Ipata, Anna E; Bisley, James W et al. (2014) Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey. J Vis 14:
Zhang, Mingsha; Wang, Xiaolan; Goldberg, Michael E (2014) A spatially nonselective baseline signal in parietal cortex reflects the probability of a monkey's success on the current trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:8967-72
Steenrod, Sara C; Phillips, Matthew H; Goldberg, Michael E (2013) The lateral intraparietal area codes the location of saccade targets and not the dimension of the saccades that will be made to acquire them. J Neurophysiol 109:2596-605
Xu, Yixing; Wang, Xiaolan; Peck, Christopher et al. (2011) The time course of the tonic oculomotor proprioceptive signal in area 3a of somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 106:71-7
Bisley, James W; Goldberg, Michael E (2010) Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:1-21
Gee, Angela L; Ipata, Anna E; Goldberg, Michael E (2010) Activity in V4 reflects the direction, but not the latency, of saccades during visual search. J Neurophysiol 104:2187-93
Falkner, Annegret L; Krishna, B Suresh; Goldberg, Michael E (2010) Surround suppression sharpens the priority map in the lateral intraparietal area. J Neurosci 30:12787-97
Ipata, Anna E; Gee, Angela L; Bisley, James W et al. (2009) Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area create a priority map by the combination of disparate signals. Exp Brain Res 192:479-88
Ganguli, Surya; Bisley, James W; Roitman, Jamie D et al. (2008) One-dimensional dynamics of attention and decision making in LIP. Neuron 58:15-25
Gottlieb, Jacqueline; Balan, Puiu F; Oristaglio, Jeff et al. (2008) Task specific computations in attentional maps. Vision Res :

Showing the most recent 10 out of 21 publications