Accurate transmission of the genetic information requires complete duplication of the chromosomal DNA each cell division cycle. However, the idea that replication forks would form at origins of DNA replication and proceed without impairment to copy the chromosomes in the cell is too simple. The orderly progression of replication forks is challenged by encounters with template damage, slow moving and arrested RNA polymerases, and frozen DNA-protein complexes that stall the fork. Stalled forks are foci for genomic instability that causes genetic alterations and can give rise to cancer. Stalled forks must be remodeled/repaired and replication restarted/continued in order to maintain genomic stability. We have developed an Escherichia coli DNA replication system that allows us to analyze the consequences of collision of the replisome with leading-strand template damage. Using this system we have discovered that: (i) the E. coli replisome is inherently DNA damage- tolerant, capable of skipping over the leading-strand template lesion and restarting replication downstream; (ii) not all trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases can interact successfully with the replisome to accomplish lesion bypass; (iii) replisome-mediated TLS competes with lesion skipping, and (iv) access to SFs of recombination proteins such as RecA, RecG, and RuvAB is different and that nascent strand regression catalyzed by these proteins at SFs is post-replicative, occurring once the replisome has moved downstream of the stall point. Using this replication system we can model all aspects of replisome stalling in vitro: the stall itself, replication restart by lesion skipping, polymerase uncoupling, lesion bypass, and remodeling of the SF by nascent strand regression. In this proposal we investigate the integrated network of responses to DNA damage that the bacterium uses to preserve genomic integrity. We ask: (i) how do stalled forks contribute to induction of the DNA damage (SOS) response? (ii) What is the mechanism of the UmuDC DNA replication checkpoint elaborated by the SOS response? (iii) What are the dynamics of exchange between DNA polymerase IV and DNA polymerase III during replisome-mediated trans-lesion bypass? (iv) How does DNA polymerase V interact with the replisome to accomplish trans-lesion bypass? And (v), how do replisomes overcome collisions with RNA polymerases that are themselves stalled by DNA template damage.

Public Health Relevance

Our genetic information must be duplicated accurately each time a cell in our body divides in order to prevent the accumulation of mutations and preserve the integrity of the genome. If proteins involved in these processes become mutated, they can cause DNA damage syndromes that lead to cancer. This proposal seeks to understand how various pathways that act to preserve genomic integrity operate and interact with one another.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM034557-34
Application #
9231452
Study Section
Molecular Genetics A Study Section (MGA)
Program Officer
Reddy, Michael K
Project Start
1984-07-01
Project End
2019-02-28
Budget Start
2017-03-01
Budget End
2018-02-28
Support Year
34
Fiscal Year
2017
Total Cost
$609,493
Indirect Cost
$262,993
Name
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
Department
Type
Research Institutes
DUNS #
064931884
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10065
Gupta, Sankalp; Yeeles, Joseph T P; Marians, Kenneth J (2014) Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially. J Biol Chem 289:28376-87
Gabbai, Carolina B; Yeeles, Joseph T P; Marians, Kenneth J (2014) Replisome-mediated translesion synthesis and leading strand template lesion skipping are competing bypass mechanisms. J Biol Chem 289:32811-23
Gupta, Sankalp; Yeeles, Joseph T P; Marians, Kenneth J (2014) Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: II. Regression by RecA is inhibited by SSB. J Biol Chem 289:28388-98
Gupta, Milind K; Guy, Colin P; Yeeles, Joseph T P et al. (2013) Protein-DNA complexes are the primary sources of replication fork pausing in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:7252-7
Yeeles, Joseph T P; Marians, Kenneth J (2013) Dynamics of leading-strand lesion skipping by the replisome. Mol Cell 52:855-65
Yeeles, Joseph T P; Poli, Jérôme; Marians, Kenneth J et al. (2013) Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a012815
Yeeles, Joseph T P; Marians, Kenneth J (2011) The Escherichia coli replisome is inherently DNA damage tolerant. Science 334:235-8
Marceau, Aimee H; Bahng, Soon; Massoni, Shawn C et al. (2011) Structure of the SSB-DNA polymerase III interface and its role in DNA replication. EMBO J 30:4236-47
Gabbai, Carolina B; Marians, Kenneth J (2010) Recruitment to stalled replication forks of the PriA DNA helicase and replisome-loading activities is essential for survival. DNA Repair (Amst) 9:202-9
Heller, Ryan C; Marians, Kenneth J (2007) Non-replicative helicases at the replication fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 6:945-52

Showing the most recent 10 out of 61 publications