Dynamics of Regulatory RNAs in Bacteria Small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) in bacteria regulate cell growth and stress response, coordinating the levels of gene expression in response to diverse environmental conditions. Genes regulated by sRNAs control host interactions, virulence and toxin expression in many pathogenic bacteria, and thus have a direct impact on human health. How sRNAs recognize and base pair with their mRNA targets is not understood, in part because each RNA molecule must change structure in order for the two RNAs to pair with each other. Base pairing between sRNAs and mRNAs is facilitated by a protein chaperone Hfq, which is required for genetic regulation by sRNAs. The physical interactions between sRNAs, mRNAs and Hfq protein dictate how these regulatory switches operate and how different regulatory pathways intersect within the same bacterium. Biochemical, physical and genetic methods will used to study how bacterial non-coding sRNAs control gene expression, using the master stress-response regulator rpoS as a model. The 3D conformation of the Hfq-rpoS RNA complex will be determined by biochemical footprinting, mutagenesis and SAXS. The mechanism by which Hfq recruits sRNAs and stimulates pairing with mRNA targets will be investigated using fluorescence spectroscopy and protein engineering. The requirement for Hfq binding sites in mRNAs and sRNAs in vivo will be compared in negatively and positively regulated mRNAs, using rpoS-lacZ translational fusions in E. coli. Results of genetic experiments will be correlated with in vitro measurements of sRNA annealing and Hfq binding. The results will show how the structure or stability of Hfq-sRNA- mRNA complexes determines downstream regulatory outcomes, which is currently unknown. As Hfq is homologous to eukaryotic Sm proteins, the results will be also relevant to understanding how Sm proteins act in human mRNA turnover and pre-mRNA splicing.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bacterial pathogens use small RNA molecules to control genes that help them survive in the human body and produce toxins after infection. The goal of this research project is to determine the physical shapes of these small RNAs, and how they come together with messenger RNAs and a RNA chaperone protein to turn genes on and off in bacterial cells.
|Santiago-Frangos, Andrew; Kavita, Kumari; Schu, Daniel J et al. (2016) C-terminal domain of the RNA chaperone Hfq drives sRNA competition and release of target RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E6089-E6096|
|Zheng, Amy; Panja, Subrata; Woodson, Sarah A (2016) Arginine Patch Predicts the RNA Annealing Activity of Hfq from Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria. J Mol Biol 428:2259-64|
|Panja, Subrata; Woodson, Sarah A (2015) Fluorescence reporters for Hfq oligomerization and RNA annealing. Methods Mol Biol 1259:369-83|
|Panja, Subrata; Santiago-Frangos, Andrew; Schu, Daniel J et al. (2015) Acidic Residues in the Hfq Chaperone Increase the Selectivity of sRNA Binding and Annealing. J Mol Biol 427:3491-500|
|Panja, Subrata; Paul, Rakesh; Greenberg, Marc M et al. (2015) Light-Triggered RNA Annealing by an RNA Chaperone. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54:7281-4|
|Peng, Yi; Curtis, Joseph E; Fang, Xianyang et al. (2014) Structural model of an mRNA in complex with the bacterial chaperone Hfq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:17134-9|
|Peng, Yi; Soper, Toby J; Woodson, Sarah A (2014) Positional effects of AAN motifs in rpoS regulation by sRNAs and Hfq. J Mol Biol 426:275-85|
|Panja, Subrata; Schu, Daniel J; Woodson, Sarah A (2013) Conserved arginines on the rim of Hfq catalyze base pair formation and exchange. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7536-46|
|Panja, Subrata; Woodson, Sarah A (2012) Hexamer to monomer equilibrium of E. coli Hfq in solution and its impact on RNA annealing. J Mol Biol 417:406-12|
|Peng, Yi; Soper, Toby J; Woodson, Sarah A (2012) RNase footprinting of protein binding sites on an mRNA target of small RNAs. Methods Mol Biol 905:213-24|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 29 publications