A remarkable feature of the actin cytoskeleton is the coexistence within a single cell of diverse actin structures containing different sets of actin-binding proteins and exhibiting diverse morphologies, mechanical behavior, and turnover rates. Misregulation of the actin cytoskeleton and altered mechanical interactions with the extracellular matrix are associated with many forms of cancer and believed to contribute to differences in motility and morphology from normal cells. Recent studies have shown that mechanical stimuli can have a large impact on the motility and cytoskeletal morphology of cells, but mechanisms by which forces are converted into biochemical signals are only beginning to be uncovered. We propose to investigate the role that mechanical forces play in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. In particular, we focus on two proteins that stabilize or destabilize F-actin: tropomyosin and ADF/cofilin. These proteins affect the turnover of F-actin, which determines how quickly a cytoskeletal structure can be remodeled, and they may also play a role in determining network architecture and the particular complement of actin-binding proteins in the network by excluding some and including others. We hypothesize that the stress state of F-actin alters the binding of regulatory proteins to the sides of the filament. Rather than proteins having a single set of kinetic parameters that may depend only on the nucleotide state of the filament and on biochemical regulation of the proteins themselves, we hypothesize that protein binding may be promoted or inhibited by changes in tension on the filament. This idea is inspired in part by our recent finding that the branching complex Arp2/3 is more likely to bind to the outside of bent filaments than to straight filaments. In this R01 renewal application, we propose to test the idea that force on F-actin alters the binding and competition of ADF/cofilin and tropomyosin, both in vitro and in live cells, using a combination of unique force microscopy and fluorescence microscopy tools. The results of this study will provide the foundation for a new perspective on how cells may use mechanical stimuli to regulate actin cytoskeleton turnover and organization.
Dynamic actin networks internally organize cells and coordinate their movement and shape change. In cancer and other diseases, this internal organization is disrupted and cell movements become aberrant, leading in some cases to metastasis. This project will investigate a potential mechanism for controlling actin network organization based on the idea that mechanical loads on individual filaments alter the ability of proteins to bind, thereby changing network structure and function.
|Fourniol, Franck J; Li, Tai-De; Bieling, Peter et al. (2014) Micropattern-guided assembly of overlapping pairs of dynamic microtubules. Methods Enzymol 540:339-60|
|Vahey, Michael D; Fletcher, Daniel A (2014) The biology of boundary conditions: cellular reconstitution in one, two, and three dimensions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 26:60-8|
|Good, Matthew C; Vahey, Michael D; Skandarajah, Arunan et al. (2013) Cytoplasmic volume modulates spindle size during embryogenesis. Science 342:856-60|
|Diz-Munoz, Alba; Fletcher, Daniel A; Weiner, Orion D (2013) Use the force: membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. Trends Cell Biol 23:47-53|
|Ricca, Benjamin L; Venugopalan, Gautham; Fletcher, Daniel A (2013) To pull or be pulled: parsing the multiple modes of mechanotransduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25:558-64|
|Richmond, David L; Schmid, Eva M; Martens, Sascha et al. (2011) Forming giant vesicles with controlled membrane composition, asymmetry, and contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:9431-6|
|Lam, Wilbur A; Chaudhuri, Ovijit; Crow, Ailey et al. (2011) Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat Mater 10:61-6|
|Rosenbluth, Michael J; Crow, Ailey; Shaevitz, Joshua W et al. (2008) Slow stress propagation in adherent cells. Biophys J 95:6052-9|