Most human genes produce multiple distinct mRNA and protein isoforms through alternative splicing that may have distinct or even antagonistic biological functions. Alternative splicing is regulated by a set of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) whose functions are important in development and in a number of diseases. Our approach to the long-term goal of understanding the function of RBPs and their roles in alternative splicing is organized around the following specific aims: SA1. To develop a method for determination of the quantitative in vitro RNA binding specificity of a protein at unprecedented depth and to determine the RNA affinity landscape of RBFOX family proteins. SA2. To understand the sequence and RNA structural basis of RNA binding by MBNL and CELF family splicing factors, the extent of cooperativity and competition, and to understand the regulation of distinct subsets of targets in developmental and pathogenic contexts. SA3. To understand the binding affinity landscapes of factors that recognize motifs at the 3'ends of introns and their roles in regulation of alternative 3'splice site (3'SS) choice. We have recently developed a method called HiTS-FLIP, which provides a quantitative description of the in vitro DNA binding affinity landscape of a protein at unprecedented depth. We propose to develop a variation of this method, """"""""HiTS-FLIP-R"""""""", to assess RNA binding affinity at a similarly high resolution. The essential idea is to sequence tens of millions of DNA clusters on an Illumina Genome Analyzer 2 (GA2) flow cell, to generate the corresponding RNA sequences by primer extension of anchored DNA adapters, to add a fluorescently tagged RNA binding protein to the flow cell at various concentrations and to image binding to RNA clusters using the GA2's optics. This approach will be applied to key factors involved in development and disease, including RBFOX2 and the myotonic dystrophy (DM) related factors MBNL1 and CELF1, as well as major factors that recognize the 3'splice site and contribute to constitutive and alternative splicing. These data will be used to develop quantitative models that predict the effects on binding and regulation of defined perturbations in the levels of specific RBPs, and the roles of these factors in development and in DM.
This project will provide comprehensive resources, tools and concepts for understanding the binding of proteins to RNA. It will also generate comprehensive binding affinity data for several important RNA binding proteins that function in constitutive splicing, which is required for expression of most human genes, or alternative splicing, including analysis of proteins that play central roles in development and in diseases such as myotonic dystrophy and cancer.
|Taliaferro, J Matthew; Vidaki, Marina; Oliveira, Ruan et al. (2016) Distal Alternative Last Exons Localize mRNAs to Neural Projections. Mol Cell 61:821-33|
|Taliaferro, J Matthew; Lambert, Nicole J; Sudmant, Peter H et al. (2016) RNA Sequence Context Effects Measured InÂ Vitro Predict InÂ Vivo Protein Binding and Regulation. Mol Cell 64:294-306|
|Wang, Eric T; Ward, Amanda J; Cherone, Jennifer M et al. (2015) Antagonistic regulation of mRNA expression and splicing by CELF and MBNL proteins. Genome Res 25:858-71|
|Katz, Yarden; Wang, Eric T; Silterra, Jacob et al. (2015) Quantitative visualization of alternative exon expression from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 31:2400-2|
|Katz, Yarden; Li, Feifei; Lambert, Nicole J et al. (2014) Musashi proteins are post-transcriptional regulators of the epithelial-luminal cell state. Elife 3:e03915|
|Lambert, Nicole; Robertson, Alex; Jangi, Mohini et al. (2014) RNA Bind-n-Seq: quantitative assessment of the sequence and structural binding specificity of RNA binding proteins. Mol Cell 54:887-900|
|Wang, Yang; Xiao, Xinshu; Zhang, Jianming et al. (2013) A complex network of factors with overlapping affinities represses splicing through intronic elements. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:36-45|
|Wu, Xuebing; Sharp, Phillip A (2013) Divergent transcription: a driving force for new gene origination? Cell 155:990-6|
|Almada, Albert E; Wu, Xuebing; Kriz, Andrea J et al. (2013) Promoter directionality is controlled by U1 snRNP and polyadenylation signals. Nature 499:360-3|
|Spies, Noah; Burge, Christopher B; Bartel, David P (2013) 3' UTR-isoform choice has limited influence on the stability and translational efficiency of most mRNAs in mouse fibroblasts. Genome Res 23:2078-90|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications