Facilitating Maltreated Children's Disclosures Child maltreatment is one of the most serious threats to children's well-being. At the same time, substantial percentages of maltreated children never disclose maltreatment, disclose in an incomplete and unconvincing manner, or recant their allegations. As yet, little scientific research has directly and experimentally examined effective procedures for overcoming motivational barriers to disclosure. Given the critical importance of maltreated children's disclosure for the protection of children, it is imperative to understand factors affecting these children's willingness to disclose abuse and the accuracy and completeness of their reports. The proposed program of research will involve a series of novel laboratory and field experimental studies designed to identify interviewing methods that facilitate maltreated children's disclosures while minimizing false allegations. The project will address four specific aims: 1) To develop novel preparatory methods for eliciting disclosures from maltreated children without increasing the likelihood of false reports;2) to identify question-types that maximize the accuracy and completeness of maltreated children's disclosures;3) to identify verbal and nonverbal indices of accurate, complete, and credible reports;and 4) to experimentally test the efficacy of novel interviewing methods in field interviews.
Aims 1 and 2 will involve laboratory experimental studies with maltreated and non-maltreated children matched for SES and ethnicity who experience staged events so that ground truth is known. Interviewing techniques will be varied systematically to assess the how the techniques affect children's disclosures. Next, Aim 3 will involve computerized analyses of children's behaviors to identify the verbal and nonverbal indices of true and false reports and evaluations of professionals'and lay persons'perceptions of children's credibility. Finally, in Aim 4, the most promising approaches identified via the lab experiments will be employed in a field experiment that directly tests the effects of interviewing innovations on abuse disclosures in children identified as potential victims by social services. This is the only research program of this nature in the world: it combines laboratory and field experimental research methods to understand disclosure and non-disclosure in maltreated children. The research represents an unprecedented opportunity to advance theories of child development and developmental psychopathology and provide critical insight into best practice interview strategies that optimize accurate and credible disclosures in maltreated children. The implementation of such practices in social and legal services will improve the process by which maltreatment is investigated, and thus promote and protect children and their families.

Public Health Relevance

Child maltreatment is one of the most serious threats to children's well-being. The child's report is often an essential element in determining whether maltreatment occurred. This project will develop innovative interviewing methods for increasing true reports of abuse without increasing false allegations.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HD047290-07
Application #
8279252
Study Section
Psychosocial Development, Risk and Prevention Study Section (PDRP)
Program Officer
Maholmes, Valerie
Project Start
2006-05-01
Project End
2016-03-31
Budget Start
2012-04-01
Budget End
2013-03-31
Support Year
7
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$391,584
Indirect Cost
$100,101
Name
University of Southern California
Department
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
072933393
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90089
Evans, Angela D; Stolzenberg, Stacia N; Lyon, Thomas D (2017) Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses ""Do You Know/Remember"" Questions. Psychol Public Policy Law 23:191-199
Stolzenberg, Stacia N; McWilliams, Kelly; Lyon, Thomas D (2017) Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations. J Exp Psychol Appl 23:447-459
Stolzenberg, Stacia N; Lyon, Thomas D (2017) 'Where were your clothes?' Eliciting descriptions of clothing placement from children alleging sexual abuse in criminal trials and forensic interviews. Legal Criminol Psychol 22:197-212
Klemfuss, J Zoe; Cleveland, Kyndra C; Quas, Jodi A et al. (2017) Relations between Attorney Temporal Structure and Children's Response Productivity in Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse. Legal Criminol Psychol 22:228-241
Stolzenberg, Stacia N; McWilliams, Kelly; Lyon, Thomas D (2017) Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications. Law Hum Behav 41:398-409
Ding, Xiao Pan; Wu, Si Jia; Liu, Jiangang et al. (2017) Functional neural networks of honesty and dishonesty in children: Evidence from graph theory analysis. Sci Rep 7:12085
Rush, Elizabeth B; Stolzenberg, Stacia N; Quas, Jodi A et al. (2017) The Effects of the Putative Confession and Parent Suggestion on Children's Disclosure of a Minor Transgression. Legal Criminol Psychol 22:60-73
Ding, Xiao Pan; Heyman, Gail D; Fu, Genyue et al. (2017) Young children discover how to deceive in 10 days: a microgenetic study. Dev Sci :
Cleveland, Kyndra C; Quas, Jodi A; Lyon, Thomas D (2016) Valence, Implicated Actor, and Children's Acquiescence to False Suggestions. J Appl Dev Psychol 43:1-7
Fu, Genyue; Heyman, Gail D; Lee, Kang (2016) Learning to Be Unsung Heroes: Development of Reputation Management in Two Cultures. Child Dev 87:689-99

Showing the most recent 10 out of 68 publications