Assessments of severe behavior disorders of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have revealed that behavior problems are often maintained by their functional outcomes (or reinforcers). For example, children may gain caregiver attention or escape instructional demands via their problem behavior. Behavioral interventions built upon this framework comprise the current standard of psychological care. These interventions typically involve teaching or otherwise promoting appropriate, alternative behaviors that produce identical or similar reinforcers as the problem behavior, to displace the problem behavior. Numerous studies have validated the effectiveness of these interventions under initial conditions, but others have revealed that their therapeutic effects sometimes wane as the ratio of responses to reinforcers is increased (or "thinned") to make the interventions practical in natural environments (e.g., classrooms). We previously proposed that principles from the field of behavioral economics, including stimulus substitutability and demand elasticity, can help to determine the conditions under which behavioral interventions may be expected to maintain their effects across changes in intervention schedules. In the initial budget period, we conducted investigations that demonstrated that a) the choice behavior of children with IDD and behavior disorders is systematically sensitive to behavioral economic manipulations involving stimulus substitutability and demand elasticity, and b) behavioral interventions based on these principles can often produce clinical effects that are more durable than what is often prescribed under the current standard of care. In the current proposal, we again adopt a translational approach to extend our analysis of behavioral economic principles, and their relevance to problem behavior, through both laboratory and clinical investigations. Six studies are proposed that a) further explore concepts of substitutability and demand elasticity to enhance treatment effects, b) employ concepts related to open vs. closed economies to both understand the influence of extraneous sources of reinforcement on response allocation and decrease motivation for problem behavior, and c) employ concepts related to "penalty" and "interest" to model how response allocation can be shifted away from problem behavior and towards appropriate behavior.
The current investigation aims to use concepts and principles of behavioral economics to enhance the practicality, durability, and efficacy of interventions for the severe behavior disorders of children with developmental disabilities.
|Leon, Yanerys; Borrero, John C; DeLeon, Iser G (2016) Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers. J Appl Behav Anal 49:639-55|
|Miller, Jonathan R; DeLeon, Iser G; Toole, Lisa M et al. (2016) Contingency Enhances Sensitivity to Loss in a Gambling Task with Diminishing Returns. Psychol Rec 66:301-308|
|Levy, Allison; DeLeon, Iser G; Martinez, Catherine K et al. (2016) A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal :|
|Alter, Margaret M; Borrero, John C (2015) Teaching generatively: Learning about disorders and disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal 48:376-89|
|Rooker, Griffin W; DeLeon, Iser G; Borrero, Carrie S W et al. (2015) REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR. Behav Interv 30:1-35|
|Jessel, Joshua; Borrero, John C; Becraft, Jessica L (2015) Differential reinforcement of other behavior increases untargeted behavior. J Appl Behav Anal 48:402-16|
|Castillo, Mariana I; Borrero, John C; Mendres-Smith, Amber E (2014) Evaluating the presence versus absence of the reinforcer during extinction. J Appl Behav Anal 47:617-22|
|DeLeon, Iser G; Chase, Julie A; Frank-Crawford, Michelle A et al. (2014) Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference. J Appl Behav Anal 47:293-313|
|Donaldson, Jeanne M; DeLeon, Iser G; Fisher, Alyssa B et al. (2014) Effects of and preference for conditions of token earn versus token loss. J Appl Behav Anal 47:537-48|
|Jessel, Joshua; Borrero, John C (2014) A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures. J Appl Behav Anal 47:314-24|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications