Syntactic flexibility refers to the fact that speakers can express most ideas with more than one syntactic structure. Such flexibility implies that the production system must choose which structure to use to express an idea, a process that is guided by two classes of factors. Information-processing factors, including accessibility (speakers use structures that mention accessible material earlier) and syntactic persistence (speakers use structures like those they have recently encountered), cause speakers to choose structures based on the cognitive or linguistic properties of the to-be-produced material. Communicative factors, including features of dialogue and discourse, cause speakers to select structures that facilitate information- transmission and coordination. These classes of factors are necessarily interrelated, as communicative influences must be exerted through the information-processing mechanisms that underlie syntactic production. The experiments proposed in Section I will use picture-naming and sentence-recall tasks situated in communicative settings to investigate the information-processing basis of sentence production by determining how accessibility and syntactic persistence effects are influenced by factors related to working memory, incrementality, lexical-syntactic interactions, and implicit learning. Specific theoretical questions that are addressed include how different working-memory constructs (storage, retrieval, executive functioning) influence sentence production, the scope of sentence planning, current accounts of the degree to which sentence planning is based on lexical versus lexical-pius-syntactic processing, and whether syntactic persistence reflects implicit learning or residual accessibilty. The experiments proposed in Section II will extend this approach to investigate how accessibility and syntactic-persistence effects are influenced by communicative factors including discourse and dialogue structure and disfluency. The broad theoretical question addressed in Section II concerns the degree to which the influence of communicative factors reduces to the influences of production-motivated information-processing factors, versus being fundamental cognitive primitives that influence sentence production. The proposed research promises important new theoretical and practical insights. The cognitive mechanisms to be explored in the experiments form the basis both of psycholinguistic theory and language development. Better understanding of how such mechanisms lead to typical language production and communication will constrain and develop existing theory, as well as guide the development of approaches to diagnosing language and more general disorders and improving treatment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HD051030-08
Application #
7793580
Study Section
Language and Communication Study Section (LCOM)
Program Officer
Mccardle, Peggy D
Project Start
2001-12-01
Project End
2012-03-31
Budget Start
2010-04-01
Budget End
2012-03-31
Support Year
8
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$199,902
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California San Diego
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
804355790
City
La Jolla
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
92093
Li, Chuchu; Goldrick, Matthew; Gollan, Tamar H (2017) Bilinguals' twisted tongues: Frequency lag or interference? Mem Cognit 45:600-610
Ivanova, Iva; Branigan, Holly P; McLean, Janet F et al. (2017) Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances. Lang Cogn Neurosci 32:175-189
Ivanova, Iva; Ferreira, Victor S; Gollan, Tamar H (2017) Form Overrides Meaning When Bilinguals Monitor for Errors. J Mem Lang 94:75-102
Maxfield, Nathan D; Olsen, Wendy L; Kleinman, Daniel et al. (2016) Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter. Clin Neurophysiol 127:1942-60
Kleinman, Daniel; Gollan, Tamar H (2016) Speaking Two Languages for the Price of One: Bypassing Language Control Mechanisms via Accessibility-Driven Switches. Psychol Sci 27:700-14
Warker, Jill A; Dell, Gary S (2015) New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 41:1902-10
Kleinman, Daniel; Runnqvist, Elin; Ferreira, Victor S (2015) Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task. Cogn Psychol 79:68-101
Hall, Matthew L; Ahn, Y Danbi; Mayberry, Rachel I et al. (2015) Production and comprehension show divergent constituent order preferences: Evidence from elicited pantomime. J Mem Lang 81:16-33
Gollan, Tamar H; Kleinman, Daniel; Wierenga, Christina E (2014) What's easier: doing what you want, or being told what to do? Cued versus voluntary language and task switching. J Exp Psychol Gen 143:2167-95
Wardlow, Liane; Ivanova, Iva; Gollan, Tamar H (2014) The cognitive mechanisms underlying perspective taking between conversational partners: evidence from speakers with Alzheimer?s disease. Neuropsychologia 56:184-95

Showing the most recent 10 out of 52 publications