Poor reading ability has profound cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences for the developing child, and-if unremediated-eventually has economic consequences for the adult. Indeed, the 2003 report on Adult Literacy and Life Skills (Statistics Canada and OECD, 2005) estimates that 51percent of US adults aged 16-25 can read only simple texts and make only low-level inferences, a level termed """"""""below-basic,"""""""" which is insufficient for attaining advanced educational and occupational goals. These statistics point to the need for understanding factors contributing to poor reading ability beyond the single-word level in the adult population. This application brings together findings from three largely independent research communities (memory, adult sentence and discourse processing, and reading disability) and creates a novel approach towards understanding poor comprehension. Whereas, the bulk of linguistically-based research into sentence and text-level comprehension has emphasized a limited set of general cognitive capacities (especially working memory capacity) as the source of comprehension difficulty, and focused primarily on the college-level population, this project is built around an architectural framework that emphasizes memory retrieval as the mechanism connecting word- reading skills and higher-level integrative skills. Building on memory research pointing to a severely limited active memory capacity, even for skilled readers, we assume that comprehension is primarily determined by the successful retrieval of information from passive memory. Thus, in our Specific Aim 1 we investigate the conditions leading to successful retrieval, including the way that different types of linguistic cus (phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic) are combined, and the conditions leading to failed retrieval- namely the presence of memory interference.
Our Specific Aim 2 combines long standing conclusions from memory research, suggesting that sensitivity to interference will be determined by the quality of to-be-retrieved representations, with research in reading disability, arguing that individuals will vary in the average quality of their word representations, which are determined by their reading experience and facility for processing different types of linguistic information. Finally, our Specific Aim 3 investigates the neurologica bases of sensitivity to retrieval interference, with primary focus on the neural networks that link skilled word reading to higher level processing, and the contribution of regions responsible for mediating interference at each level, especially left inferior frontal gyrus. We include both college and non-college community-based individuals (age 16-24), to provide a more representative sample of reading ability than in previous studies and thus increase the impact of our potential findings. In addition, we recruit a sample of beginning readers (age 7-9) for an initial investigation of the development of retrieval and sensitivity to interference. We expect tht this project will result in a new conception of sources of individual variability in reading comprehension, and a deeper understanding of how these develop in childhood and persist into adulthood.

Public Health Relevance

This project addresses the finding that 51% of US adults aged 16-25 have below basic reading comprehension ability, restricting them from attaining educational and occupational goals. Our primary goal is to understand how memory retrieval and interference contributes to skilled and unskilled reading comprehension, with particular emphasis on articulating the neurobiological mechanisms through which interference is mediated at every linguistic level (words, sentences, discourse). In order to have broad impact, we target a community-based sample of mainly non-college-bound individuals (age 16-24), as well as a school-aged sample (age 7-9), which provides both an initial cross-sectional examination of development and a highly representative sample of reading comprehension ability in the population at large.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HD073288-02
Application #
8607202
Study Section
Language and Communication Study Section (LCOM)
Program Officer
Miller, Brett
Project Start
2013-01-23
Project End
2017-11-30
Budget Start
2013-12-01
Budget End
2014-11-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$643,894
Indirect Cost
$277,933
Name
Haskins Laboratories, Inc.
Department
Type
DUNS #
060010147
City
New Haven
State
CT
Country
United States
Zip Code
06511
Tan, Yingying; Martin, Randi C; Van Dyke, Julie A (2017) Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models. Front Psychol 8:198
Schmidtke, Daniel; Van Dyke, Julie A; Kuperman, Victor (2017) Individual Variability in the Semantic Processing of English Compound Words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn :
Schmidtke, Daniel; Matsuki, Kazunaga; Kuperman, Victor (2017) Surviving Blind Decomposition: A Distributional Analysis of the Time-Course of Complex Word Recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn :
Warriner, Amy Beth; Shore, David I; Schmidt, Louis A et al. (2017) Sliding into happiness: A new tool for measuring affective responses to words. Can J Exp Psychol 71:71-88
Kukona, Anuenue; Braze, David; Johns, Clinton L et al. (2016) The real-time prediction and inhibition of linguistic outcomes: Effects of language and literacy skill. Acta Psychol (Amst) 171:72-84
Kuperman, Victor; Van Dyke, Julie A; Henry, Regina (2016) Eye-Movement Control in RAN and Reading. Sci Stud Read 20:173-188
Snefjella, Bryor; Kuperman, Victor (2016) It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing. Cognition 156:135-146
Matsuki, Kazunaga; Kuperman, Victor; Van Dyke, Julie A (2016) The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading. Sci Stud Read 20:20-33
Braze, David; Katz, Leonard; Magnuson, James S et al. (2016) Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading. Read Writ 29:435-451
Breen, Mara; Kaswer, Lianne; Van Dyke, Julie A et al. (2016) Imitated Prosodic Fluency Predicts Reading Comprehension Ability in Good and Poor High School Readers. Front Psychol 7:1026

Showing the most recent 10 out of 23 publications