Forty-six percent of employers offer insurance coverage for telemedicine services today, up from 28% in 2013. This is a significant shift from historical patterns where telemedicine care delivery was largely promoted in underserved inner city and rural areas in order to improve access to specialty care. With the expansion of the internet, faster connection speeds, improved bandwidth, and greater use of mobile devices, more patients have the means to access providers via telemedicine from their home, potentially improving access and convenience more broadly. Understanding how video telemedicine, when made widely accessible, changes the patient-provider interface is critical to understanding how to more efficiently and effectively deliver care. Two barriers to the expansion of telemedicine on a broad basis have been 1) the lack of a telemedicine platform through which patients can access a wide range of physicians from their own home and 2) the lack of insurance coverage when provider consultation is sought. These barriers have recently been overcome by one of the largest US health insurers, which offers a direct-to-consumer, video telemedicine tool. The tool gives 19 million adults around-the-clock access to physicians via computer or mobile device, improving convenience and removing access barriers that arise from travel time, the need to leave work, or the need for child care. This form of telemedicine is distinct from disease-specific programs and from electronic telemedicine visits (?e-visits?) studied previously. Patient response to this form of direct-to-consumer, video telemedicine is not well understood. Our multi-year study will take advantage of a natural experiment provided by the insurer's introduction of the virtual visits through a direct-to-consumer telemedicine tool to study the effect of the tool on 1) patient access to care, 2) quality of care, and 3) utilization and expenditures for common conditions across alternative sources of care (retail clinics, primary care offices, emergency room). The study is innovative in its analysis of a unique natural experiment that created differential financial incentives for video telemedicine use among insured adults, its use of unique data, the size of the intervention group (19 million adult enrollees), its longitudinal design, and collaboration with a large US private insurer. Findings from this study will inform private insurer policies, state telemedicine laws and regulations, as well as Medicare and Medicaid coverage policy where coverage is geographically limited or restricted to a narrow set of services,

Public Health Relevance

This study is designed to shed light on the impact of broad-based, video telemedicine that is directly accessible by consumers rather than from provider offices. The telemedicine program being studied is offered by a national insurer to 19 million insured members. This study will provide insights into whether direct-to- consumer, video telemedicine improves access to care, improves quality of care, and reduces costs for common conditions and in doing so will inform Medicare, Medicaid, and state telemedicine policies.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01HS025163-01
Application #
9287259
Study Section
Healthcare Information Technology Research (HITR)
Program Officer
Goins, Geri
Project Start
2017-04-01
Project End
2020-03-31
Budget Start
2017-04-01
Budget End
2018-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2017
Total Cost
$222,708
Indirect Cost
Name
National Bureau of Economic Research
Department
Type
Research Institutes
DUNS #
054552435
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138