This research examines the capabilities and limitations of cognition initiated by visual 'subliminal' stimuli. These are visual stimuli presented so as to evade conscious attention. The proposed research gives special attention to types of subliminal presentations that are now easily achievable in the mass media of TV and film. Since the mid-1950s, broad and generally unsubstantiated claims of effective therapeutic or other influence by visual subliminal stimuli have appeared in popular press, entertainment media, and marketplace. Until the mid-1980s, scientific evaluation of those claims was severely restricted by scientists' studied avoidance of the topic because of its air of disreputability, and by unavailability of research methods that could decisively evaluate claims. Previous work on this project has contributed to overcoming both of these constraints. The proposed research carries forward these gains by (a) testing for possible cumulative effects of several types of repeated subliminal visual presentations, (b) applying methods developed in the project's previous studies of subliminal text stimuli to test for effects of subliminal graphic/pictorial stimuli, (c) locating the currently elusive upper bound of analytic capability of cognition in response to subliminal stimuli, (d) extending the project's methods for appraising the time course of cognitive processing of subliminal stimuli to supraliminal stimuli, (e) seeking to reconcile competing published claims concerning temporal persistence of effects of subliminal visual stimuli, and (f) developing a diagnostic procedure that can provide comparative appraisal of theorized attitude conditioning procedures.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH041328-10
Application #
6186046
Study Section
Social and Group Processes Review Committee (SGP)
Program Officer
Kurtzman, Howard S
Project Start
1988-02-01
Project End
2002-04-30
Budget Start
2000-06-16
Budget End
2001-04-30
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
$111,229
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Washington
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
135646524
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98195
Sriram, N; Greenwald, Anthony G; Nosek, Brian A (2010) Correlational biases in mean response latency differences. Stat Methodol 7:277-291
Greenwald, Anthony G; Poehlman, T Andrew; Uhlmann, Eric Luis et al. (2009) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 97:17-41
Greenwald, Anthony G (2005) A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:221-5
Nosek, Brian A; Greenwald, Anthony G; Banaji, Mahzarin R (2005) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 31:166-80
Greenwald, Anthony G; Nosek, Brian A; Banaji, Mahzarin R et al. (2005) Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). J Exp Psychol Gen 134:420-5; author reply 426-30
Pinter, Brad; Greenwald, Anthony G (2005) Clarifying the role of the ""other"" category in the self-esteem IAT. Exp Psychol 52:74-9
Greenwald, Anthony G; Greenwald, Anthony G (2004) On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:632-6
Greenwald, Anthony G (2003) On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:859-68
Greenwald, Anthony G; Abrams, Richard L; Naccache, Lionel et al. (2003) Long-term semantic memory versus contextual memory in unconscious number processing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:235-47
Greenwald, Anthony G; Nosek, Brian A; Banaji, Mahzarin R (2003) Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:197-216

Showing the most recent 10 out of 34 publications