Schizophrenia affects ~1% of all people. It is characterized by delusions and hallucinations resulting in high morbidity and mortality. These symptoms may be underpinned by misperceptions and misinterpretations of sensations that result from a basic inability to predict sensations and adapt to deviations from the expected. If predictive coding mechanisms are dysfunctional, sensations that should have been predicted, but were not, may take on inappropriate salience and lead to the construction of delusional schema to explain aberrant experience. These errors of prediction are costly to society and the patient. Predictive coding models posit that higher order brain areas develop and maintain representations of predictable sensory stimuli, increasing efficiency of neural activity by reducing sensory cortical responses to these stimuli and increasing sensory responses to stimuli that violate the predicted pattern. In such models, the role of primary sensory cortices is to encode and transmit sensory """"""""prediction errors,"""""""" that is, to respond mainly to those stimuli that deviate from the brain's representations of expected stimuli. In context-based predictive coding, the brain acquires and remembers the context of regular temporal and spatial patterns of sensory input. In action-based predictive coding, the predictability of sensory events derives from the fact that sensory events are a predictable consequence of one's own actions, and do not need to be learned or remembered. Conceptually, action-based predictive coding models subsume efference-copy/corollary discharge forward model systems described across the animal kingdom in which an """"""""efference copy"""""""" of an impending motor plan is transmitted from motor to sensory cortex where it generates a """"""""corollary discharge"""""""" representation of the expected sensory consequences of the imminent motor act. Building on our prior work, we propose to ask how predictability and performance monitoring affect action-based predictive coding and how they affect sensory/perceptual processing in schizophrenia. We will use EEG and fMRI, acquired separately and simultaneously, to interrogate details of efference copy and corollary discharge components of action-based predictive coding. Using EEG, we can assess the split-second activity preceding a motor act, or the efference copy. Using fMRI, we can assess the spatial precision of the suppressive action of the corollary discharge mechanism. By integrating EEG and fMRI, we can understand the functional neuroanatomical basis of predictive coding and its abnormalities in schizophrenia. Finally, we are adopting a paradigm and using methods that are translatable to animal models of SZ and that can ultimately be used to identify specific elements of circuits involved in predictive coding, transmitters involved in te neural mechanisms responsible for predictive coding, and even genes that underlie psychotic experiences and behavior.
Predictive coding abnormalities characterize schizophrenia. By using paradigms and methods to study predictive coding that are used in lab animals, we can identify specific elements of the circuit, transmitters involved in the neural mechanisms, and even genes that underlie psychotic experiences and behavior.
|Hamilton, Holly K; D'Souza, Deepak C; Ford, Judith M et al. (2018) Interactive effects of an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist and a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist on mismatch negativity: Implications for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 191:87-94|
|Biagianti, Bruno; Roach, Brian J; Fisher, Melissa et al. (2017) Trait aspects of auditory mismatch negativity predict response to auditory training in individuals with early illness schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol 3:|
|Kort, Naomi S; Ford, Judith M; Roach, Brian J et al. (2017) Role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors in Action-Based Predictive Coding Deficits in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 81:514-524|
|Ford, Judith M (2017) Current Approaches to Studying Hallucinations: Overcoming Barriers to Progress. Schizophr Bull 43:21-23|
|?ur?i?-Blake, Branislava; Ford, Judith M; Hubl, Daniela et al. (2017) Interaction of language, auditory and memory brain networks in auditory verbal hallucinations. Prog Neurobiol 148:1-20|
|Vignapiano, A; Mucci, A; Ford, J et al. (2016) Reward anticipation and trait anhedonia: An electrophysiological investigation in subjects with schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol 127:2149-60|
|Mifsud, Nathan G; Oestreich, Lena K L; Jack, Bradley N et al. (2016) Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants. Psychophysiology 53:723-32|
|Oestreich, Lena K L; Mifsud, Nathan G; Ford, Judith M et al. (2016) Cortical Suppression to Delayed Self-Initiated Auditory Stimuli in Schizotypy: Neurophysiological Evidence for a Continuum of Psychosis. Clin EEG Neurosci 47:3-10|
|Ford, Judith M; Roach, Brian J; Palzes, Vanessa A et al. (2016) Using concurrent EEG and fMRI to probe the state of the brain in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin 12:429-41|
|Ford, Judith M (2016) Studying auditory verbal hallucinations using the RDoC framework. Psychophysiology 53:298-304|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 36 publications