Prior research suggests that at least two processes are involved in recognition judgments: A fast similarity-based process and a slower recall-like process. However, very little research has explored the specific operation of the recall process. Many researchers have proposed that the recall process operates in a recall-to-reject fashion. In a recall-to-reject process, a test foil that is similar to a studied stimulus is rejected (i.e., called """"""""new"""""""") because the studied stimulus is recalled and the mismatch with the similar foil is noticed. For a variety of associative recognition tasks, such as recognizing whether two words were studied together or whether a test word was studied on a particular stimulus list, there is evidence for the use of such a recall-to-reject process. However, item recognition tasks have found no support for the use of recall-to-reject processing. Instead, the data from item recognition tasks are consistent with a recall-to-accept process in which a memory trace that matches the test probe must be retrieved in order for a positive (""""""""old"""""""") response to be generated. The proposed research will provide more direct evidence on the operation of the recall-based process in item and associative recognition. New research will: 1) seek converging and unique evidence on the nature of the recall process using receiver- operating characteristic (ROC) curves, 2) estimate the contribution of the underlying processing using conjoint recognition theory, and 3) demonstrate a consequence of the recall process, namely, the inhibition of studied items that are similar to a studied test item. Two pilot studies provide evidence for this inhibitory phenomenon in a recognition task, and the proposed inhibition experiments will a) evaluate the development of that inhibition over processing time; b) determine the extent of the inhibition as a function of the similarity and number of studied items; and c) explore the relationship between the presence or absence of inhibition and the specific operation of the recall process (i.e., recall-to-reject or recall-to- accept).

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
6R01MH060274-02
Application #
6392558
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BBBP-4 (01))
Program Officer
Kurtzman, Howard S
Project Start
2001-06-01
Project End
2002-12-31
Budget Start
2001-06-01
Budget End
2002-12-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$76,750
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
153223151
City
Amherst
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
01003
White, Corey N; Kapucu, Aycan; Bruno, Davide et al. (2014) Memory bias for negative emotional words in recognition memory is driven by effects of category membership. Cogn Emot 28:867-80
Starns, Jeffrey J; Pazzaglia, Angela M; Rotello, Caren M et al. (2013) Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 39:1377-92
Dube, Chad; Starns, Jeffrey J; Rotello, Caren M et al. (2012) Beyond ROC curvature: Strength effects and response time data support continuous-evidence models of recognition memory. J Mem Lang 67:389-406
Starns, Jeffrey J; Rotello, Caren M; Ratcliff, Roger (2012) Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of ýýROC slope: a comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38:793-801
Wong, Mungchen; Rotello, Caren M (2010) Conjunction errors and semantic transparency. Mem Cognit 38:47-56
Kapucu, Aycan; Macmillan, Neil A; Rotello, Caren M (2010) Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: evidence for alternative decision strategies. Mem Cognit 38:541-54
Masson, Michael E J; Rotello, Caren M (2009) Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:509-27
Evans, Kris; Rotello, Caren M; Li, Xingshan et al. (2009) Scene perception and memory revealed by eye movements and receiver-operating characteristic analyses: does a cultural difference truly exist? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 62:276-85
Kapucu, Aycan; Rotello, Caren M; Ready, Rebecca E et al. (2008) Response bias in ""remembering"" emotional stimuli: a new perspective on age differences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:703-11
Rotello, Caren M; Masson, Michael E J; Verde, Michael F (2008) Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Percept Psychophys 70:389-401

Showing the most recent 10 out of 25 publications