There is a great deal of evidence that eye movements and attention are linked. However, evidence regarding the nature of the link is sometimes contradictory and lacking. Specification of the relationship between the two systems would allow us to consider attention, which is a poorly specified construct, within the relatively concrete and neurally well understood domain of eye movements. We propose to investigate the relationship between attention and eye movements within a new domain to help resolve some of the contradictions and fill in some of the gaps of knowledge. Specifically, we seek to understand the relationship between attention and eye movements through an investigation of attentional resolution, which is the precision with which one can discretely move attention among closely spaced items. Attentional resolution is remarkably coarse given the precision with which people can perceive simply that there are multiple items present. Eye movements, it seems, may be limited in a similar way; counting items in a closely spaced display, for example, is no easier when one is allowed to fixate the items than when one must rely on attention only. Together, these observations suggest that oculomotor limitations may determine at least some attentional limitations (or vice versa), thereby providing a specific link and domain of inquiry between the two systems. We will begin by comparing attentional resolution to saccadic resolution, which is the precision with which people can move their eyes to individual items. We hypothesize that the limits of attentional control are imposed by the limits of saccadic control, and therefore that attentional resolution will be indiscriminable from or coarser than saccadic resolution. We will then relate the instability of ocular fixation to the coarseness of attentional resolution. We hypothesize that the limitations of attentional resolution are at least partly determined by the spatial uncertainty that is created by ocular jitter during fixation, and therefore that attentional resolution will be finer when that jitter is eliminated by optically stabilizing the display. Finally, we will assess how experimental manipulations that are known to affect saccadic behavior affect attentional resolution. We hypothesize, for example, that transient adaptation of the saccadic system will transfer to the attentional control system and alter observers' attentional resolution.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH067793-04
Application #
7050161
Study Section
Biobehavioral and Behavioral Processes 3 (BBBP)
Program Officer
Quinn, Kevin J
Project Start
2003-06-05
Project End
2008-03-31
Budget Start
2006-04-01
Budget End
2007-03-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$285,930
Indirect Cost
Name
Pennsylvania State University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
003403953
City
University Park
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
16802
Scharff, Alec; Palmer, John; Moore, Cathleen M (2013) Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes. J Vis 13:18
Scharff, Alec; Palmer, John; Moore, Cathleen M (2011) Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:813-33
Yigit-Elliott, Serap; Palmer, John; Moore, Cathleen M (2011) Distinguishing blocking from attenuation in visual selective attention. Psychol Sci 22:771-80
Scharff, Alec; Palmer, John; Moore, Cathleen M (2011) Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization. Psychon Bull Rev 18:713-21
Hein, Elisabeth; Moore, Cathleen M (2010) Investigating temporal properties of covert shifts of visual attention using the attentional walk task. Psychon Bull Rev 17:41-6
Moore, Cathleen M; Hein, Elisabeth; Grosjean, Marc et al. (2009) Limited influence of perceptual organization on the precision of attentional control. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:971-83
Hein, Elisabeth; Moore, Cathleen M (2009) Explicit eye movements failed to facilitate the precision of subsequent attentional localization. Exp Brain Res 197:387-93
Palmer, John; Moore, Cathleen M (2009) Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention. Vision Res 49:1045-64
Moore, Cathleen M; Lanagan-Leitzel, Lyndsey K; Fine, Elisabeth M (2008) Distinguishing between the precision of attentional localization and attentional resolution. Percept Psychophys 70:573-82
Moore, Cathleen M; Mordkoff, J Toby; Enns, James T (2007) The path of least persistence: object status mediates visual updating. Vision Res 47:1624-30

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications