Men who have sex with men (MSM) represent the largest proportion of AIDS deaths, and HIV incidence in the US. While prevention efforts targeting MSM have successfully reduced HIV incidence in the US, many men are not reached by these efforts, including male couples. Studies of gay men in Europe and the US report as high as 68% of new HIV infections being attributed to unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) within primary partnerships. As we enter into the final year of the Longitudinal Gay Couple's study it is clear that in order to develop an effective HIV prevention intervention for couples, we must further examine the three key areas: poorly-defined or broken agreements regarding sex outside the relationship, high rates unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with primary partners and a lower level of HIV testing. For instance, our on-going study found that 32% of couples broke their agreement at least once in the past year yet less than half disclosed it to their partner. Additional specificity is needed to understand how broken agreements are linked with HIV risk. These broken agreements are often left undisclosed. Our work has also shown that discordant couples report UAI with their primary partner (47%). Our data suggest that agreements about sex with outside partners are distinct from agreements or discussions about sex within primary partnerships. Given the high rates of seroconversions occurring in gay male couples, within couple sexual agreements, relationship factors associated these agreements, and risk should be explored. While the on-going LCS examined agreements about sex with outside partners, the proposed study will additionally examine the characteristics of agreements within the relationship. Moreover, our data showed a substantial proportion of HIV-negative men engaged in UAI with a discordant or HIV status unknown partner in the 90 days, yet they had not tested for six months or more. The disturbing patterns of a lack of testing, broken agreements, and non-disclosure, and UAI among discordant couples must be examined in further detail so that we can develop an intervention that is effective and relevant to couples at risk. We propose to continue our program of mixed methods research examining HIV risk in the context of gay male couples. We will recruit and qualitatively interview 20 new couples within the first six months of the study to examine relationship factors associated with HIV testing and develop a new measure of HIV risk perception and attitudes towards HIV testing that is specifically developed for gay couples. Meanwhile, we will continue to follow the cohort of couples participating in the on-going LCS (we estimate that approximately N=100 will be retained) and recruit a supplemental sample of 400 new couples to examine new and more specific quantitative lines of inquiry regarding agreements and couple-based motivations for HIV testing as well as to provide enhanced statistical power to increase our ability to detect associations between variables of interest in the original study. Finally, we will begin development of a couples-based intervention for gay couples using focus group and qualitative interview methods (N = 52).
problem in the US is the high proportion of men who have sex with men who are getting infected with HIV. A recent report of US surveillance data reported that up to 68% of new infections are a result of UAI within male couples. The proposed study will elucidate relationship factors associated with risky sexual behavior and why many delay testing. To date very little is known about male couples and the unique prevention needs they have. The proposed research will identify partner factors, individual factors and environmental factors associated with sexual risk among this high risk group: male couples. Since reports of gay men's behavior prior to the AIDS epidemic and since suggest that half of gay men are in a committed relationship with another man, we are facing a public health crisis for this population.
|Beougher, Sean C; Bircher, Anja E; Chakravarty, Deepalika et al. (2015) Motivations to test for HIV among partners in concordant HIV-negative and HIV-discordant gay male couples. Arch Sex Behav 44:499-508|
|Darbes, Lynne A; Chakravarty, Deepalika; Neilands, Torsten B et al. (2014) Sexual risk for HIV among gay male couples: a longitudinal study of the impact of relationship dynamics. Arch Sex Behav 43:47-60|
|Beougher, Sean C; Mandic, Carmen Gómez; Darbes, Lynae A et al. (2013) Past present: Relationship dynamics may differ among discordant gay male couples depending on HIV infection history. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv 25:|
|Darbes, Lynae A; Chakravarty, Deepalika; Beougher, Sean C et al. (2012) Partner-provided social support influences choice of risk reduction strategies in gay male couples. AIDS Behav 16:159-67|
|Beougher, Sean C; Chakravarty, Deepalika; Garcia, Carla C et al. (2012) Risks worth taking: safety agreements among discordant gay couples. AIDS Care 24:1071-7|
|Chakravarty, Deepalika; Hoff, Colleen C; Neilands, Torsten B et al. (2012) Rates of testing for HIV in the presence of serodiscordant UAI among HIV-negative gay men in committed relationships. AIDS Behav 16:1944-8|
|Gomez, Anu Manchikanti; Beougher, Sean C; Chakravarty, Deepalika et al. (2012) Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS Behav 16:1584-8|
|Hoff, Colleen C; Chakravarty, Deepalika; Beougher, Sean C et al. (2012) Relationship characteristics associated with sexual risk behavior among MSM in committed relationships. AIDS Patient Care STDS 26:738-45|
|Beougher, Sean C; Gomez, Walter; Hoff, Colleen C (2011) The couple as context: Latino gay male couples and HIV. Cult Health Sex 13:299-312|
|Hoff, Colleen C; Beougher, Sean C; Chakravarty, Deepalika et al. (2010) Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus. AIDS Care 22:827-35|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications