The ultimate objective of the proposed study is to further develop a set of measures capable of assessing the integrity of cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBT) for anxiety in youths. Despite the success of CBT for child anxiety in controlled trials, measurement gaps in the field limit efforts to (a) refine and optimize the effectiveness of CBT, and (b) evaluate the success of CBT clinician training efforts. Indeed, there is a paucity of evidence-based measurement strategies to assess the integrity of efforts to implement CBT programs for child anxiety and none that incorporate the three dimensions of integrity. The proposed study addresses this significant methodological gap through the further development and validation of a set of observational measures designed to assess the key components of treatment integrity-treatment adherence, therapist competence, and treatment differentiation-concerning CBT for youths with anxiety. The project will accomplish two primary aims: (a) Establish reliability (interrater reliability, internal consistency, generalizability) and validity (convergent, discriminant) for the treatment integrity measures;and (b) Provide evidence linking data from these measures to (i) child outcomes, and (ii) therapy input variables (e.g., client, therapist characteristics). Recorded therapy sessions from three randomized clinical trials (RCTs;efficacy and 2 effectiveness trials) evaluating CBT for youth with primary anxiety disorders will be used to accomplish these aims. The research project progresses through three phases. In Phase I, the psychometric properties of the treatment integrity measures will be assessed using recorded therapy sessions of CBT for anxiety in youths from one efficacy and one effectiveness trial. The psychometric data provided in Phase I will be used to refine the measures during Phase II. The measures will then be used in Phase III to code archived therapy sessions of CBT for anxiety in youths from an effectiveness study. The resulting data will be used to investigate key questions of theoretical and practical interest, with an eye toward optimizing the effectiveness and efficiency of CBT, including: (a) Exploring the relations among treatment adherence, competence, differentiation, and outcomes in CBT for anxiety in youth;and (b) Identify sources of variation in the integrity of CBT for anxiety in youth. The proposed study is the first to examine the relation between the three integrity components (treatment adherence, competence, differentiation) and clinical outcomes in CBT for children with anxiety disorders. Moreover, the measures produced by the proposed study may be used as a gold standard against which to validate parent- and therapist report measures of integrity.
The ultimate objective of the proposed study is to further develop a set of measures capable of assessing the extent to which therapists implement manualized cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBT) for youth anxiety with integrity and skill. Linking the quality of treatment implementation to clinical outcomes will help identify key elements in the delivery of psychological treatments for youth anxiety, thereby helping to optimize the effects of CBT. In addition, the development and further testing of these measures may help to promote effective and efficient training for treatment of youth anxiety.
|Southam-Gerow, Michael A; McLeod, Bryce D; Arnold, Cassidy C et al. (2016) Initial development of a treatment adherence measure for cognitive-behavioral therapy for child anxiety. Psychol Assess 28:70-80|
|McLeod, Bryce D; Jensen-Doss, Amanda; Tully, Carrie B et al. (2016) The role of setting versus treatment type in alliance within youth therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 84:453-64|
|McLeod, Bryce D; Smith, Meghan M; Southam-Gerow, Michael A et al. (2015) Measuring treatment differentiation for implementation research: the Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies scale. Psychol Assess 27:314-25|
|Southam-Gerow, Michael A; McLeod, Bryce D (2013) Advances in Applying Treatment Integrity Research for Dissemination and Implementation Science: Introduction to Special Issue. Clin Psychol (New York) 20:1-13|
|McLeod, Bryce D; Southam-Gerow, Michael A; Tully, Carrie B et al. (2013) Making a Case for Treatment Integrity as a Psychosocial Treatment Quality Indicator for Youth Mental Health Care. Clin Psychol (New York) 20:14-32|
|McLeod, Bryce D; Islam, Nadia Y (2011) Using Treatment Integrity Methods to Study the Implementation Process. Clin Psychol (New York) 18:36-40|