18% of 18-25 year-olds seek help for psychological distress (e.g., depressive/anxiety symptoms, failing to cope with everyday stressors and interpersonal relationships). Yet unfortunately, there are few or no previous psychiatric history, and no biological, measures to predict future functional outcome and guide treatment choice for these vulnerable individuals. Two dimensions of behaviors and experiences that are common in these individuals, with potentially deleterious consequences for psychosocial function, are: impulsive sensation seeking, the tendency and willingness to seek, and take risks for, novel and intense sensations and experiences;and anhedonia, the inability to experience pleasure. The Research Domain Criteria is a dimensional approach to psychiatric illness that includes neural circuitry and self-report (SR) measures of behaviors related to dimensional constructs in core domains that are agnostic to DSM diagnoses. We have identified in non-help seeking (unaffected) and help-seeking (affected) adults significant relationships among neuroimaging measures of reward neural circuitry function and SR measures of the above two behaviors, that are in turn related to two positive valence systems domain constructs: reward expectancy and sustained responsiveness to reward attainment. We will recruit 150 affected 18-25 year-olds seeking help for psychological distress, irrespective of DSM diagnosis (>1 visit to student counseling/ emergency room psychiatrist/ Pittsburgh Youth and Family Training Institute (YFTI);referred to primary care/psychiatric services, continuing counseling/YFTI;unmedicated or SRI antidepressant/stimulants <2 weeks);and 125 age-, gender-, ethnicity-, SES- and IQ-matched unaffected individuals. We hypothesize: 1. Reward expectancy: greater reward circuitry activity and functional connectivity (FC) (in ventral striatum (VS), lateral orbitofrontal cortex) to monetay reward expectancy will be associated with higher scores on standardized measures of impulsive sensation seeking. Sustained responsiveness to reward attainment: greater medial prefrontal cortical activity and medial prefrontal cortical-VS FC to happy faces/monetary reward receipt will be associated with higher scores on standardized measures of anhedonia. Neuroimaging-SR relationships may differ between affected and unaffected individuals. 2. We will identify underlying factors among these neuroimaging and SR measures in all individuals, and separately in affected and unaffected individuals. 3. In affected individuals, the magnitude of many of these measures and factor scores will be significant predictors of poor outcome: no. days'hospitalization/intensive outpatient care;worsening psychological distress, affective/anxiety/ADHD symptoms, psychosocial function, quality of life;developing suicide ideation/attempt, psychosis, substance abuse/dependence. The proposed study aims to identify measures reflecting dimensions of pathophysiology in 18-25 year-olds seeking help for psychological distress, to ultimately provide neurobiological targets to guide personalized treatment, and optimize functional outcome for these vulnerable young people.
Almost one-fifth of all of 18-25 year-olds seek help from mental health professionals for some type of psychological problem (e.g., depressive and anxiety symptoms, failing to cope with everyday stressors and interpersonal relationships), but unfortunately, there are few previous psychiatric history, and no biological, measures that can accurately identify which of these vulnerable young people will go on to develop serious mental health problems. Impulsive sensation seeking (wanting to take risks for new experiences) and anhedonia (being unable to enjoy previously pleasurable things) are two common dimensions of behaviors and experiences that often lead to the problems experienced by young, help-seeking people, and are each associated with functional abnormalities in brain reward circuitry. We propose to identify key relationships among these problem behaviors and measures of brain reward circuitry function in help-seeking and non help-seeking 18-25 year-olds, to help us identify biological measures that can predict future outcome, and ultimately pave the way for the development of better treatments for vulnerable young people with mental health problems.
|Ham, Byung-Joo; Greenberg, Tsafrir; Chase, Henry W et al. (2016) Impact of the glucocorticoid receptor BclI polymorphism on reward expectancy and prediction error related ventral striatal reactivity in depressed and healthy individuals. J Psychopharmacol 30:48-55|
|Chase, Henry W; Phillips, Mary L (2016) Elucidating neural network functional connectivity abnormalities in bipolar disorder: toward a harmonized methodological approach. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 1:288-298|
|Iyengar, Satish (2016) Case for fMRI data repositories. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:7699-700|
|Manelis, A; Ladouceur, C D; Graur, S et al. (2016) Altered functioning of reward circuitry in youth offspring of parents with bipolar disorder. Psychol Med 46:197-208|
|Romens, Sarah E; Casement, Melynda D; McAloon, Rose et al. (2015) Adolescent girls' neural response to reward mediates the relation between childhood financial disadvantage and depression. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:1177-84|
|Chase, Henry W; Clos, Mareike; Dibble, Sofia et al. (2015) Evidence for an anterior-posterior differentiation in the human hippocampal formation revealed by meta-analytic parcellation of fMRI coordinate maps: focus on the subiculum. Neuroimage 113:44-60|