Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are increasingly being implemented in large community mental health systems. Much of the research to date has focused on policy, organizational and practitioner variables that predict adoption and initial implementation of EBPs, yet understanding sustainment is crucial to facilitate a return on costly investments in EBP development. Furthermore, most studies focus on the implementation of a single EBP, limiting opportunities to examine theoretically important predictors of implementation success concerning fit between EBPs and the contexts in which they are utilized. The proposed study will examine the impact of a major policy change mandating use of EBPs and organizational context, organizational accommodation, and practitioner attitudes and adaptations as determinants of EBP sustainment in the largest public mental health system in the United States. Our primary outcomes of interest are two aspects of sustainment: practitioner-level penetration and agency and practitioner structural and intervention fidelity to EBP models.
Specific aims are as follows: (1) Characterize sustainment outcomes (Penetration, Fidelity); (2) Use mixed methods to characterize inner context factors and early implementation conditions that potentially predict EBP sustainment; (3) Identify inner context (organizational and practitioner) and early implementation conditions that determine sustainment outcomes. This project will yield new understanding of whether and how multiple EBPs can be sustained in public mental health systems undergoing a policy-driven community implementation effort. We will produce generalizable models for characterizing sustainment, including feasible and flexible measurement of fidelity across multiple EBPs. The findings will inform the development of implementation interventions to promote sustained delivery of EBPs to maximize their public health impact.
Although there are increasing numbers of large-scale efforts to implement evidence-based practices in community service settings, many of these efforts fail or practices are not sustained after initial implementation. We will take advantage of the large-scale, fiscally mandated implementation of multiple EBPs in Los Angeles County to study determinants of key sustainment outcomes. The proposed study will inform the development of implementation interventions to promote the sustained delivery of EBPs to maximize the public health impact of community mental health services.
|Stadnick, Nicole A; Lau, Anna S; Barnett, Miya et al. (2017) Comparing Agency Leader and Therapist Perspectives on Evidence-Based Practices: Associations with Individual and Organizational Factors in a Mental Health System-Driven Implementation Effort. Adm Policy Ment Health :|
|Lau, Anna; Barnett, Miya; Stadnick, Nicole et al. (2017) Therapist report of adaptations to delivery of evidence-based practices within a system-driven reform of publicly funded children's mental health services. J Consult Clin Psychol 85:664-675|
|Barnett, Miya; Brookman-Frazee, Lauren; Regan, Jennifer et al. (2017) How Intervention and Implementation Characteristics Relate to Community Therapists' Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practices: A Mixed Methods Study. Adm Policy Ment Health 44:824-837|
|Regan, Jennifer; Lau, Anna S; Barnett, Miya et al. (2017) Agency responses to a system-driven implementation of multiple evidence-based practices in children's mental health services. BMC Health Serv Res 17:671|
|Brookman-Frazee, Lauren; Stadnick, Nicole; Roesch, Scott et al. (2016) Measuring Sustainment of Multiple Practices Fiscally Mandated in Children's Mental Health Services. Adm Policy Ment Health 43:1009-1022|
|Lau, Anna S; Brookman-Frazee, Lauren (2016) The 4KEEPS study: identifying predictors of sustainment of multiple practices fiscally mandated in children's mental health services. Implement Sci 11:31|